Replies

According to Beck, al-Harbi means “of the clan of Harbi”. Sort of like Ben Harbi would mean “the son of Harbi”.

I need to listen again to what Walid Shoebat said about this guy’s family, to try to understand how wide-ranging a clan is and which of them would be considered his immediate family. Unfortunately, I’d have to go to the office to be able to hear that again.

But it’s all a smokescreen because this guy at the hospital is actually Osama Bin Laden’s son Hamza, not an Alharbi. The name was either stolen from somebody else or a cover identity created when he had the plastic surgery to alter his ears (and possibly other features as well). But the bone structure can’t be altered, and it is that of Bin Laden’s son, according to facial recognition expert MestaMachine. And for the “known terrorist” classification to be slapped on him so quickly (Tuesday at 4pm) after the Monday evening investigation there must have been something VERY convincing. Especially since whistleblowers are risking 20 years in prison in order to report the shenanigans at DHS to members of Congress and to Beck.

I suspect DNA testing confirmed that this was Bin Laden’s son. They took his clothes from the hospital, to analyze it for evidence, and could easily have found DNA to use for an analysis, which takes 8 hours if rushed. Hardraade has suggested that somebody knew about Hamza in advance and alerted the investigation. My suggestion is former CIA head David Petraeus, who has lots of reasons to want the truth about the terrorist Barack Obama to be known to the world.

Whoah, butter! You are jumping to way too many conclusions here. First of all, what I do involves a whole lot more than ‘facial recognition’. Please stop bandying my name around as a facial recognition expert. It minimizes me to something that puts me in a box and does not do justice to who I am or what I actually do.
Secondly, all of the conjecture about plastic surgeries and the like is unnecessary. He didn’t need it. If you look at ALL the photographs plus the video, nothing has been changed.
Thirdly, the admin would already have known from the gitgo exactly who he was and their first encounter did not just happen lately.
There is a lot more to this, but the direction you are taking is wrong. I just woke up and saw this and I am nowhere near well enough to try and explain all the places this speculation has gone off the rails.
Hardraade called it a ‘snap’ id, It wasn’t. You don’t just snap to an id like that. There are countless other points of verification and they ALL have to match up. He does.
But the rest of it is just wrong. I am sorry, but it is.