Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cuban leaf
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, so-called "faith healing" (healing or resurrection ^because^ of the faith of another) went away with the last of the Apostles.

19 posted on 04/23/2013 10:55:02 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

That said, so-called “faith healing” (healing or resurrection ^because^ of the faith of another) went away with the last of the Apostles.


Since I’ve experienced it, I’ll have to disagree on that one. However, your quoting of the constitution is where I am coming from on this. It is none of our business. They are not our children.

Now, if the parents are actively killing them, that is a different matter.


25 posted on 04/23/2013 11:00:14 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; All

When religion injures another, that’s when it is fine to step in....we would not allow parents to sacrifice their children, and we should not allow them to murder them by failure to act.

As for faith healing, special healing has ceased. But, God can still heal miraculously, just not in the faith healer way.


33 posted on 04/23/2013 11:06:48 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
"Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves. But it does not follow they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion when they can make that choice for themselves."--Prince v. Massachusetts (U.S. Supreme Court 1944).
53 posted on 04/23/2013 11:23:36 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; cuban leaf

If my religion allows human sacrifice does it mean I can do it?


59 posted on 04/23/2013 11:30:32 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do ithat when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson