Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bamahead

I guess it comes down to a choice.

Safety & Security OR the US Constitution?

Ironically it’s normally the liberals who choose Safety & Security over the Constitution.

We cannot choose which parts of the Constitution we follow and which parts are not important. That’s exactly how we got a pResident many do not know is Constitutionally eligible to be President and it’s exactly how we came close to losing our rights to own guns. It was politics and the power of the NRA that saved the right to bear arms this time around and NOT the US Constitution and that is SAD.

Just my opinion. I could be wrong. I do understand the arguments coming from those who want him to be tried as an enemy combatant.


49 posted on 04/22/2013 11:09:41 AM PDT by tsowellfan (www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: tsowellfan

He’s an American citizen plain and simple. His rights are the same as yours or mine. That cannot be argued.

What COULD be argued, is whether he attained his naturalization and citizenship under false pretenses. If so, I believe the existing law allows for stripping or nullification of his citizenship.

So far it seems the prosecutors are not going that route.


56 posted on 04/22/2013 11:14:54 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson