Since the Boston bombers had at least one gun, where did they get them in the toughest gun state in the country.
I thought I would post this thread again. It’s an excellent read.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/02/17/the-nation-toughest-gun-control-law-made-massachusetts-less-safe/3845k7xHzkwTrBWy4KpkEM/story.html
They also had grenades and supposedly other military grade explosives. They could have just as easily walked into a gun free school zone and blown the legs off of hundreds of children. Instead, a child lost his life and other children and adults lost their limbs at the marathon.
The liberals need to wake up and stop coddling terrorists. Let the American people protect ourselves and not interfere with our constitutional right to bear arms.
If they had grenades, why did they make one from a pot and some chaff ?
Has anyone reported on what kind of firearms these two characters were sporting? I’m guessing an AK or two.
“Since the Boston bombers had at least one gun, where did they get them in the toughest gun state in the country.”
I was just thinking about this a few minutes ago, and lo and behold, a thread pops up on FR about it.
You asked the right question. Where did they get their gun(s)?
A follow up question is why isn’t the media all over this? Very unusual that they wouldn’t have been all over the “gun shop” that sold them.
If the guns were “stolen” why isn’t the media all over this story about “unsecured weapons”?
Inquiring minds want to know.
“Defend our freedom from tyrants”........great thought, that’s what the 2nd amendment was for. Unfortunately, that has gone by the boards when looking at the firepower of those in power,if they ever turned on the people.