Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

And How Many Bullets Do You Need?
American Thinker ^ | 04/20/2013 | Jim Yardley

Posted on 04/21/2013 6:42:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Last night, I watched the amateur home video of the shootout between Boston and Watertown police and the person referred to as "Suspect #1."

I learned that there were something on the order of 200 shots fired during that firefight.

Think about that for just a moment. It took a dozen or more cops, who are trained professionals, who practice on at least a weekly basis with their firearms, to fire 200 rounds before he finally died.

Yet our politicians (at least here in New York, and some in Washington -- as well as other places, I'm sure) are saying that the most anyone needs to have to protect himself from armed intruders is seven rounds in the magazine.

Only seven?!

Of course, it took trained police, who were not dealing with an unexpected attack, who were not roused from a peaceful slumber, who were not worried about their wives and kids, some 200 rounds to kill one dangerous man.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; bullets; guncontrol; secondamendment; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: RKV

Well I’m actually a member of the force and I know that there aren’t any policies or “policies” anywhere that advocate anything other than well aimed shots. To do so would be to invite lawsuits up the yinyang as well as possible prison time.

Police officers generally are poor shots and tactically illiterate, it has nothing to do with policy.


101 posted on 04/21/2013 5:28:25 PM PDT by Ajnin (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnocet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It took a dozen or more cops, who are trained professionals, who practice on at least a weekly basis with their firearms, to fire 200 rounds before he finally died.

Highly trained?

They had a billion dollars worth of Law enforcement in the immediate area, National Guard, FBI, CIA, animal control, NSA, code enforcement, transit police, cops were bussed in on school buses from 30 surrounding cities, helicopters, dogs, swat teams and no doubt military drones circling over head.

BTW, didn't #1 die from being ran over by #2, as #2 then fled and lost the pursuers?

102 posted on 04/21/2013 5:33:49 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin

So you need it in writing for it to be a policy, huh? Not me. Not when I read the reports on how many shots fired - at least by LAPD, which is what I’m familiar with from my older brother. Specifically here’s some recent LAPD stats. http://www.lapdonline.org/assets/pdf/2009YearEndReportFinal.pdf

Between 2005 and 2008 LAPD on average managed to miss completely or unintentionally discharge 24 of 70 times there was a shooting (34%) which goes to my point about marksmanship.

With respect to my point about not caring what’s downrange by virtue of shooting way too many rounds try the following...
In 2009 there were 42 officer involved shootings, and over 85 officers discharged their weapons in these shootings (LAPD discounts unintentional discharges and animal shootings, me not so much, but I don’t have all their numbers). So odds are if you’re getting shot at, it’s by 2 officers. I calculated the number of rounds fired. The average was approximately 9 per engagement (4.4 per officer), and the average range at engagement was 16-20 feet. That is way too many at that distance. Making a reasonable assumption, given weapons used (mostly pistols ranging in caliber from 9mm to 45ACP) at typical distances it should at worst case take 3 rounds to down a perp on average even allowing for the the obvious difficulties of armed combat.

Since my brother has been shot twice in the line of duty I do have some sympathy for what police officers go through. Then again, no one is forcing them to take the job.


103 posted on 04/21/2013 6:07:38 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

How about that! Well glad you sent him up the river.

LLS


104 posted on 04/21/2013 6:22:48 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I copied it from a history website. I have been fighting for the 2nd for 50 years... I will research the quote further. I did not create it. Those that want to steal our guns hate Washington anyway.

LLS


105 posted on 04/21/2013 6:25:57 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

I found this...

“In all the time that I’ve spent in (8 yrs.), the usual minimum for anyone with an M16 or M4 is 210 rounds (7 x 30 rds mags.) For the M249 SAW, the basic load is 400 rounds (2 x 200 rds drum or 4 x 100 rds.). For the M240, it’s usually the same as the SAW.

Source(s):

U.S. Army Veteran (2001 - 2009)”

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091018115954AAMtSTq


106 posted on 04/21/2013 6:31:22 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

“Dude... the guys down at the motor pool can fix that... they have a bitchin’ set of tools”

LLS


107 posted on 04/21/2013 6:32:31 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I agree completely.

LLS


108 posted on 04/21/2013 6:33:27 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

Yep... that is why I defined “too much”! ;-)

LLS


109 posted on 04/21/2013 6:34:12 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Thanks for your post - you get it.

As glad that I am that the cops got this terrorist, and did so using great equipment and reasonable training (not expert perhaps, but they finally got the job done) - I looked at those videos as being on the receiving end of it if the cops and Feds ever get turned to the dark side.

Even with semi-autos and large magazines, an individual is seriously out gunned. Also shows the need to have a support group. Otherwise when they come to your house for your guns your just another nutcase with an “arsenal” of weapons and ammo.


110 posted on 04/21/2013 6:34:19 PM PDT by 21twelve ("We've got the guns, and we got the numbers" adapted and revised from Jim M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Agreed.But that does not make fake quotations ok.


111 posted on 04/21/2013 7:27:51 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
From Jeff Cooper's “Commentaries”, vol. 1, No. 9 (1993):

“Family member Dr. Werner Weissenhofer reports from Vienna. It seems that a felon armed with a .357 revolver robbed a bank. As he left the bank, he was accosted by a policeman whom he murdered with one shot. Great excitement ensued, with the felon taking hostages and racing madly around from one store to another. When the forces of law and order had been mobilized and surrounded the goblin, a policeman volunteered to trade himself to the goblin for two hostages. This offer was accepted, at which time the felon fired at the policeman and seriously wounded him. The forces of law and order opened up with everything they had, which was mostly AUG and Glock fire. Shortly, the goblin killed himself with one round. He had fired three times and achieved three hits. The police, according to their official report, fired 1,261 rounds without drawing blood.”

112 posted on 04/21/2013 8:34:54 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Pretty much what I remember from the 60’s, only we used the M-60, not the M240.....favorite was carry as much as you could and not crap out..........


113 posted on 04/21/2013 11:10:21 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (A Strong Man Armed who guards his home, lives in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

True enough.

But there are a LOT of phony quotes out there, often assigned to Washington, Jefferson or Lincoln, and unfortunately generally put forward by conservatives. After all, liberals don’t really consider these men to be admirable or authoritative.

Most conservatives who repeat the fake quotes don’t do so on purpose. It’s just that when you’re engaged in debate, some ammo is too good to check.


114 posted on 04/22/2013 3:17:27 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

With all that is wrong with the world... worry about something that matters... the left and all media hate us and they have NEVER spoken a word of the entire truth... just enough truth to make their evil taste palatable.

LLS


115 posted on 04/22/2013 4:28:00 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner

Amen!

LLS


116 posted on 04/22/2013 4:28:55 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: OCMike

“Fox News had the Watertown Chief on last night and he mentioned that the rounds fired were “dummy rounds”. I’m an ex SWAT Team member and I have never heard of “DUMMY ROUNDS(caps added) being used in a hostile tactical action. I’m not doubting his word, I just never heard of this.”

“Dummy Rounds” refers to the words spoken by the Watertown Chief, not ammo.

Poor, ickle, Liberal pol is embarrassed because a mere “untermenschen” found the terrorist instead of the many armed & armored LEO’s he had on his payroll.


117 posted on 04/22/2013 6:48:58 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I read that the elder Tsarnaev was killed after having been tackled by the cops, then the younger drove the SUV at the whole lot of them, running over and killing his brother as he crashed the line.

If true, that means 200 rounds did not even kill the b*stard. It took an SUV.


118 posted on 04/22/2013 6:51:28 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Leftists' favorite Mass Murderer: Kermit Gosnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita

Well, Obaba is buying/bought 2 billion rounds of small arms ammo to use on non-military people—one may assume to shoot his own citizens with (Geneva Convention bans hollow point ammo by the U.S.Military).

Considering that Obaba has inside info about what is/may be coming down the pipe, and so is buying ammo in a frenzy, one must assume it wise for the citizens (victims?) to also buy reasonable amounts for home and family protection, even if they do not hunt do other firearm related hobbies.


119 posted on 04/22/2013 6:57:59 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (The question is not whether Obama ever lies, but whether he ever tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RKV

If cops were TRULY trained professionals, particularly the urban cops, they would not carry machine guns. Automatic firearms tend be be “spray and pray” devices of enormous hazard to innocent bystanders.

Semi-auto weapons are VASTLY more appropriate. Even the U.S.Military knows that (though maybe the SS, er, DHS doesn’t have a clue) what with their order of thousands of machine guns (full auto ‘assault rifles’) DHS deems appropriate “for personal protection”.


120 posted on 04/22/2013 7:02:27 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (The question is not whether Obama ever lies, but whether he ever tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson