[demshateGod]

If a felon is no danger, hence being let out of prison, he/she should be allowed to own a fire arm. If they are a danger, they should be in jail. No law will stop them from having a firearm. I know you know all this. I just wanted to add it.

[PotatoChop]

You hit the nail on the head. The socialist using “felons” simply to gin up emotional support for taking Americans firearms from them.

I always understood that once an American has served their time, paid their debt to society, they cannot be denied their basic Constitutional protections. Evidently, the socialist believe that no matter how long ago you served your time, your debt has not been paid, and with every new law, you must be forced to pay your debt to society again, again, and again. So long as the socialist keep moving their agenda forward with the support of Americans!

Thanks!

[VRWCmember]

If a felon is no danger, hence being let out of prison, he/she should be allowed to own a fire arm.

The dems want to allow felons to vote. I say if you are going to let them vote then you shouldn't have a problem with reinstating their 2nd Amendment rights as well. As for the crazies, maybe we should be going after their voting rights too. If people are too criminally insane to have the right to own a gun then we shouldn't let them vote either.

[Nowhere Man]

If a felon is no danger, hence being let out of prison, he/she should be allowed to own a fire arm. If they are a danger, they should be in jail. No law will stop them from having a firearm. I know you know all this. I just wanted to add it.

Agreed. I'd trust someone who did a non-violent crime over one who is violent of course. As you put it, if they are violent, they do not belong in society until they are rehabilitated if possible. Other cases, if someone serves time, then maybe after a probationary period, six months, perhaps a year, if there are no problems, they then cam buy a firearm.