To: cuban leaf
I think I know where you are going with that but I am not sure. Could you explain it to me, please? Your final result can have no more significant digits than your least-precise measurement.
6 posted on
04/09/2013 6:23:15 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Your final result can have no more significant digits than your least-precise measurement.
Exactly right, and said better.
But taking it further:
(a) Every scientist learns this principle. Global warming alarmists are KNOWINGLY violating what they know about science.
(b) Climateers are using "temperature reconstructions" -- educated guesses -- from counting the number of bacteria in fossils, from tree rings, and from ice core samples.
These are not precise measurements.
So they cannot draw conclusions to a greater level of precision than their GUESSES drawn from counting the bacteria in the guts of long-dead animals.
8 posted on
04/09/2013 6:58:59 AM PDT by
Moseley
(http://www.curesocialism.com)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
10 posted on
04/09/2013 7:49:03 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson