Posted on 04/03/2013 6:19:47 PM PDT by Nachum
Democratic Rep. Diana DeGette, a lead sponsor of the federal ban on personal defense-capacity magazines showed a Denver Post forum she doesnt have a clue as to what it is she wants to ban, and the clarifying statement made by her spokeswoman served to confirm the ignorance of both women.
I will tell you these are ammunition, theyre bullets, so the people who have those now theyre going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there wont be any more available, DeGette claimed when asked how a ban would help reduce violence committed with firearms.
Oh no my car is out of gas! I better buy a new gas tank! commentator ParkerGuy posted under the article, wittily illustrating the level of what should be criminal ignorance under
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
If you shoved this woman’s brain up a gnat’s ass, it would rattle around like a BB in a boxcar.
“I didn’t do I so stop talkin’ about my mother”
If by "dramatically" she means "over eons"....true, eventually the springs will rust. But I think if people will actually vote for someone like her, we've crossed the Rubicon and we've now transformed the US into an idiocracy.
Having so little brain in so much empty head, it’s pretty sure nobody could kill her by shooting her in the head. The bullet would just fly through empty space, missing her mini-pea and doing no damage.
Sorry, I thought Boulder was in the 1st district. Forgot about Homo. Haven’t lived in Colorado for year. Degette really is a dim bulb.
In other bad news, Time magazine will soon have a capacity of less than 10 pages so they will not be outlawed by the high capacity ban.
Oh, don’t complain, it made as much sense as that politicians statement.
:)
The sad thing is that she isn’t even the dumbest member of Congress.
She replaced the famous patsy Schroeder. One vapid idiot replacing another......
Please God, save this nation from insane Liberals!
It is nice to see them line up all of the campaign material to be used against them.
Wouldn’t it be great if there were an opposition party to challenge them?
Before the definitions “changed”, clips were what is now called magazines.
ie-I often taped together two 15 round banana clips for my .22 long while plinking.
It was annoying to have to individually load each round.
Then a fast way of loading 15 rounds into the clip was made, and for some idiotic reason, some marketing moron deemed that a "clip".
So my “clip” was no longer called a clip, it is now deemed a magazine.
If I hand load a 15 or 30 round magazine, it is not a clip.
Because clips are a string of connected rounds, that go into magazines.
No matter, they most always jammed, if over ten rounds are loaded, no matter what you call them.
Unless you have a really expensive gun.
I prefer a snub nosed revolver, hot loaded with plastique tipped rounds.
It's never once jammed. I've heard there are clips for them now....
Ya gotta love it.
Stupid should be punishable by bad things. And not in a random, Darwin kind of way.
You gotta give DeGette some credit—she clearly has figured out that “ammunition” refers to “bullets”, and those are the thingys that you shoot.
Other weapons, such as the M1 use clips as well. Whether a M1, M16, AR-15 or M4, clips are used to load magazines. I am not aware of clips being used to load pistol or shotgun magazines. Yes, shotguns have magazines. That tube "thingy" at the front of semi-auto and pump shotguns is a magazine. It is also true that lever action rifles have magazines - another tube "thingy". There is no such thing as an attached or detachable clip.
I am not trying to come off rude. My original post was making fun of a liberal that didn't know jack about the thing they were trying to ban. Then the liberal comes back and proves she had no idea about what she was trying to ban.
Personally, I don't get hung up in everyday speech about clips and mags, but when it comes to a liberal trying to take way my rights or someone calling me young, I get a little technical. For what it is worth, my birthday is tomorrow, so I am a little sensitive about the age thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.