It looks like the other thread was pulled. I'll re-post something I said on another thread last night:
I happened to be driving somewhere just after 12:00 the other day, and I heard Rush Limbaugh's dreary monologue about the inevitability of "gay marriage" in the U.S. As I was listening to it, two things really stuck in my mind:
1. This guy has been married four times.
2. This guy had Elton John play at his last wedding in 2010.
Item #2 should not be overlooked, because it involves two aspects: (A) Limbaugh invited him, and (B) Elton John accepted the invitation.
When I got home I did some research and found some very interesting articles linked in the Google search on "Elton John, Rush Limbaugh." Among other things, Elton John says that Rush Limbaugh is very different off the air ... and he even suggests that Limbaugh (while he will never admit it publicly) is a supporter of "gay marriage."
I'll render know judgement here on Rush Limbaugh personally, but he may want to step back and ask himself just how much damage has been done to the institution of marriage by people like him who get married more frequently than they move to a new home?
This battle wasn't lost because the left corrupted language and undermined morality. It was lost because people who are supposed to know better were perfectly comfortable with what the corrupted language and undermined morality had to offer them.
I don't fault a man that's been married four times.
Look at the lack of values our public education system is turning out today.
Are women of the United States more or less likely to file for a divorce with today's legal system, and todays churches?
And Elton John's wedding?
That might have been Rush's Boss.
Julie Talbott may be the reason "why" Rush doesn't say he's against homosexual marriage.
"It was lost because people who are supposed to know betterwere perfectly comfortable with what the corrupted language and undermined morality had to offer them."
I will not disagree with premise that you state, being a part of it, but I also believe that Rush is right.
As Rush says
It
reminds me:
"For then will I turn to the people a pure language,that they may all call upon the name of the LORD,to serve him with one consent."
There's a lot more to it than first thought would permit us to ponder.
Address my
comment #1 and its links.
And
remember:
"Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men;and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
For ye see your calling, brethren,how that NOT MANY wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:
But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise;and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; and base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen,yea, and things which are not,to bring to nought things that are:That no flesh should glory in his presence. "