Here’s the answer as to whether or not it hurts children:
“58 percent of the children of lesbians called themselves gay, and 33 percent of the children of gay men called themselves gay.”
snip http://www.aolnews.com/2010/10/17/study-gay-parents-more-likely-to-have-gay-kids
Exactly, and proof positive since there is no data that says homosexuality is an absolutely genetic characteristic. In fact, the research shows no link at all to "perhaps there's a very, very weak link." Most continually looks at environmental issues. I know what I think that means.
So, given the reality above, and knowing that Scalia is not an unlearned or unread man, then what the heck was that less than knowledgeable statement all about?
Just this: Since "gay" cannot be called a deleterious effect due to political correctness, then one can't say that children raised by gays are experiencing a deleterious upbringing because they turn out to be gay.
The question is short-circuited by a dishonest, politically correct, prior assumption.
Here's the answer Mr Scalia: "Gay" itself is deleterious. Its practitioners die 10-20 years before their peer group.
Exactly, and proof positive since there is no data that says homosexuality is an absolutely genetic characteristic. In fact, the research shows no link at all to "perhaps there's a very, very weak link." Most continually looks at environmental issues. I know what I think that means.
So, given the reality above, and knowing that Scalia is not an unlearned or unread man, then what the heck was that less than knowledgeable statement all about?
Just this: Since "gay" cannot be called a deleterious effect due to political correctness, then one can't say that children raised by gays are experiencing a deleterious upbringing because they turn out to be gay.
The question is short-circuited by a dishonest, politically correct, prior assumption.
Here's the answer Mr Scalia: "Gay" itself is deleterious. Its practitioners die 10-20 years before their peer group.
Good find.