“I see what you’re saying. But I disagree about the legality viewpoint of Stanley Ann’s marriage.
She was married and she was divorced.”
I do not claim to know how SCOTUS would rule at the end of the day on Barry’s citizenship which can only happen when full discovery is obtained through documents and witnesses in both HI and, likely, Kenya, and also the UK because Kenya was a UK colony at the time of birth.
I do know it is fact that a bigamous marriage is a legal nullity (never existed). What I do not know is how and when a marriage gets declared to be a nullity.
Who has standing to bring such an action? If both parties are dead and there are no competing claims on an estate, doe a clearly bigamous marriage govern whether a baby gets to be or not to be a UK subject or US citizen by default?
Are there cases where marriages that were bigamous where declared null and void after both parties were dead?
IANAL, but if I have some time I might look into that, but until there is more discovery it would be a wild goose chase.
Perhaps if the Posse delivers on proving that Barry’s BC was forged it will open up the marriage issue and the true birth location issue.
That much at least, can reliably be said.
However, logic would seem to dictate that, regardless of whether a "marriage" between BHO (#1) and SAD turns out to be a legal nullity, if paternity is established as being by the Kenyan, it has the effect, by virtue of his foreign, non-naturalize status, of weakening, rather than strengthening the presumed tendency toward loyalty, such as is the case with parentage by TWO Citizens. Of course, IANAL either, so. . .