It’s up to US District Court Judge Henry Wingate to assess the probative value (or lack thereof) of the Onaka Letter of Verification. He has not let us know his ruling yet even though the letter is dated May 31, 2012.
While I appreciate other folks’ opinions on the letter’s worthlessness, I’ll wait for the judge to rule.
Dr. Onaka is a named defendant in Mississippi so if Judge Wingate rules that a trial should go forward, Dr. Onaka may be deposed or called to testify under oath.
The document is legally worthless. That is a fact.
Wingate can only side with the fact or side with the lie, and there are lots of ways to get him to side with the lie, like all the other judges.
The truth doesn’t move. Only people move. Those who argue that the truth is determined by where any one person or “the people” stand are clueless.
The fact is that two documents put out by the HDOH are blatant forgeries (Ah Nee’s BC has a forged Onaka signature and 2 BC# digits that overlap, and Sunahara’s death certificate has mismatched, misaligned fonts, a federal birth code on a death certificate, and a Territory of Hawaii abbreviation on a State of Hawaii certificate). When asked directly, Onaka confirmed in the verification to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that the document the White House has put on its website is a “true and accurate representation of the record on file”, Onaka effectively confirmed that it wasn’t. When asked directly by KS SOS Kris Kobach to confirm that the information contained in the White House image is “identical to” the information contained in the record on file, Onaka effectively confirmed that it isn’t. When asked to specifically verify that Barack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Honolulu on the island of Oahu, to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, Onaka effectively confirmed that none of those things can be verified as true.
The only reason the MDEC verification doesn’t reveal the non-validity of the actual HI record, Onaka’s inability to verify any actual birth facts, or the non-genuineness of the White House record.... is because Scott Tepper was very, very careful not to ask about any of those things - even though he said those were the critical issues.
The judge would be a fool to ignore the truth. Just like all the other judges before him, though this time the evidence is more than the other judges ever had.
we are endlessly "on hold" waiting for those with the authority to address this problem, throw up one delay after another, some of course quite valid, others sheer judicial obtuseness, incompetence, or far worse.
However bitter this Obama pill is to swallow, the courts' opinions count for far more than ours. But all is far from lost. Am I mistaken in sensing that The Cold Case Posse has ... if not acknowledged ... gotten an encouraging nod from those whose voices may count more than ours?