I don’t really understand why you remain so obsessively defensive of Mitt Romney several months after the election.
This thread is about the push to homosexualize the Scouts, something that the recent GOP candidate has advocated for almost 20 years, that issue has obviously not disappeared since the nominee’s defeat.
On a political forum made up largely of republican voters and potential voters knowing where the GOP is in regards to this issue, is important.
This is a political forum, not an LSD club where the platform and positions of the presidential candidate of 5 months ago is too distant to be relevant to us or even to be mentioned in your presence.
Again, show me ANY comment where I defended Mitt Romney's nomination and said he was a great candidate, and your continuous attacks on me would make logical sense.
I really don't understand why you remain so obsessively devoted to taking about Mitt Romney candidacy several months after the election. Yes, we know he's a liberal RINO with no principles. We also know Chris Shays, Connie Morella, and Jim Jeffords are RINOs with no principles, but you don't talk about them every thread and pretend they're still on the ballot and their liberal positions will make any difference now that they're in the private sector.
I agree. Unfortunately, you are not talking about where "the GOP" stands on this issue. If you did, you'd be constantly bringing up statements from Reince Pribeus and the Republican National Platform. Instead, you constantly obsess about where one particular Republican stands on this issue, and that candidate is no longer even running for office. Again, why not obsess about where George H. Bush stands on this issue since you feel bringing up past failed candidates no longer in power somehow pertains to where "the GOP" stands on this issue? How about "informing" us about Dan Quayle's position on the boy scouts? Maybe Arnold Schwarzenegger? He's a pretty well known RINO , too.