[Responsibility2nd]

...the lib places greater value on that law over his own personal convictions.

I posted that even before I knew you were on this thread. But it applies to you. You are the best example of a liberal supporting liberal agendas over you own personal convictions more than anyone else I know.

You claim you don't use drugs, but you are here every freaking day advocating for drug usage. You support the states who voted in legalized drugs, even though you claim you don't use them.

You are a hypocrite and you are immoral. You are the poster boy for Libertarianism.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

if a state passes laws that require renting to sodomites - the lib places greater value on that law over his own personal convictions.

Can you offer any reason for anyone to believe your counterintuitive claim?

You are the best example of a liberal supporting liberal agendas over you own personal convictions more than anyone else I know.

You claim you don't use drugs, but you are here every freaking day advocating for drug usage.

No, I advocate for the liberty of adults to use drugs if they choose.

Aside from that, you've drawn a false parallel. My personal conviction is that I and every other adult should be free to choose whether or not to use drugs, and that the right choice for me is to not use drugs. The correct parallel would be to a law requiring people to use drugs - which libertarians and I would oppose as steadfastly as we oppose laws requiring them not to.