Skip to comments.
$2.7M Federal Study: Why Do Lesbians Have Higher 'Risk for Hazardous Drinking'?
CNSNews ^
Posted on 03/19/2013 7:11:01 AM PDT by chessplayer
(CNSNews.com) - The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has awarded $2.7 million to study why lesbians are at a higher risk for hazardous drinking.
The University of Illinois has received grants since 2009 for its project, "Cumulative Stress and Hazardous Drinking in a Community of Adult Lesbians," which aims to develop culturally sensitive strategies to prevent lesbians from being drunks.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Not so much as a dime can be found for WH tours, though.
To: chessplayer
It’s our tax dollars, can we watch?
2
posted on
03/19/2013 7:12:48 AM PDT
by
shove_it
(Long ago Huxley, Orwell and Rand warned us about 0banana's USA.)
To: chessplayer
Because they weren’t wasting enough money studying why lesbians are fat.......
3
posted on
03/19/2013 7:13:38 AM PDT
by
massmike
(At least no one is wearing a "Ron Paul - 2016" tee shirt........yet!)
To: chessplayer
"...huge flashing red letters in my tiny unused brain screams banned banned banned"
4
posted on
03/19/2013 7:15:30 AM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: chessplayer
Well, now that we know why lesbians are fat, I guess we need to know why they drink “hazardously”. What a bunch of clowns. Lesbians must be different than normal people. The government thinks we need to “study” them separately.
5
posted on
03/19/2013 7:15:53 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Whatever happened to the land of the free, home of the brave?)
To: chessplayer
Study? Heck. One look at Big Sis, Billary, or Syphillios and you know the lesbos like to drink until oblivion.
6
posted on
03/19/2013 7:16:24 AM PDT
by
Gabrial
(The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
To: chessplayer
And lesbians are what percentage of the population?
Oh, forgot, they are a “protected species”.
7
posted on
03/19/2013 7:17:24 AM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: chessplayer
culturally sensitive strategies
Translation: Addressing all issues except the ones causing the problem.
8
posted on
03/19/2013 7:18:04 AM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: chessplayer
My personal theory is that homosexuals reject their birth genders and accept their adopted genders, as well as the behaviors associated with their adopted genders.
My theory is a result from observing the homosexuals I knew, in the area that I worked. It seemed as though, over time, male homosexuals became more feminine and lesbians would become more masculine.
9
posted on
03/19/2013 7:18:47 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: chessplayer
Because they are screwed up in the head.
Send me the change ...
10
posted on
03/19/2013 7:19:10 AM PDT
by
dartuser
(My firearm is not illegal ... its undocumented.)
To: chessplayer
Because they are fat drunks.
To: chessplayer
Why Do Lesbians Have Higher 'Risk for Hazardous Drinking'?
Because they're engaged in an natural, unhealthy lifestyle...and probably suffered childhood abuse. May I have 2.7 million now? Thanks.
12
posted on
03/19/2013 7:20:25 AM PDT
by
Vision
(Obama is king of the "Takers." Don't be a "Taker.")
To: chessplayer
Hazardous Drinking?
Can you really blame them?
13
posted on
03/19/2013 7:20:40 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: chessplayer
it is official: lesbians are different!!
14
posted on
03/19/2013 7:20:43 AM PDT
by
B212
To: chessplayer
Because they both need to get beer goggles at the bar's closing time?
15
posted on
03/19/2013 7:21:03 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
To: chessplayer
because they’re so happy and gay.
16
posted on
03/19/2013 7:21:12 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: chessplayer
Who in the hell authorized this insane study? Preposterous. You could call me, and I’ll answer the question for $1 million.
The reason they have a higher risk for Hazardous Drinking would be as such:
1) They are ashamed of their “life choice,” therefore, they would drink a lot more than the average person to “wash away” their guilt.
2) They don’t have any family at home to return to, so they can hang around with their fellow perverts and drink until they forget.
3) They try to be manly and drink more than they should.
4) Since they don’t have a spouse or children to take care of, they have more money to spend on bed and bar hopping
5) They are totally irresponsible with their sexuality, and therefore, why not be disgusting with their drinking.
6) Their irresponsible behavior is more excusable if they’re drunk.
Now, give me $1 million, and return the rest to the treasury.
17
posted on
03/19/2013 7:21:14 AM PDT
by
laweeks
To: chessplayer
Next, a $5M study to try to figure out why they carry their wallets in their back pockets.
18
posted on
03/19/2013 7:24:53 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
To: shove_it
19
posted on
03/19/2013 7:24:54 AM PDT
by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
To: Responsibility2nd
Oh man. After seeing that I might have to START drinking. And I haven’t for better than 25 years now. Hate to fall off the wagon now. LOL!
20
posted on
03/19/2013 7:25:00 AM PDT
by
rktman
(BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST MR. PRESIDENT!(not that we'd get the truth!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson