Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/19/2013 7:10:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Kaslin

Yes, today, it was worth it. God Bless our military and the sacrifices they made.


2 posted on 03/19/2013 7:13:33 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz is my adoptive Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Not at all

Trillions spent, 4,000+ American lives lost, for what?

A radical Shia state now aligned with Iran and against US interests?

This is why 4,000 of our best sacrificed their lives? This is why we spent over a trillion dollars?


3 posted on 03/19/2013 7:16:47 AM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No. The world is a much less safe place because of it. Iraq kept Iran in check, prior to the war.


4 posted on 03/19/2013 7:17:27 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If Bush the First had finished the job in 1991, we wouldn’t have had to be back in again.

Never finish wars half way, you just leave a mess for others to clean up later.


5 posted on 03/19/2013 7:17:41 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Ask the Christian community if our invasion of Iraq was a good idea. They’re suffering more than anyone.


7 posted on 03/19/2013 7:18:48 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
No.

And that was exactly the question a mid-western family asked me in 2005, when I brought their son back home to them, remains not viewable. I changed the subject.

10 posted on 03/19/2013 7:21:49 AM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
And so, 'twas a famous victory. Mission accomplished!

F U Pat. Did you even listen to the speech? Did you hear what the President said? Or are you just a tool, jumping on a band wagon?

Soon, however, America found herself in a new, unanticipated war, and by 2006

Confirmed. You are a tool, because that was what the President warned against.

13 posted on 03/19/2013 7:27:00 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Obama lied, Stevens died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nope, total waste of some of our finest warriors!! makes me sick! I see nothing worth the financial and far more important lives that were lost or destroyed because of it... with no political will to really win they were doomed from the start, no matter how bravely they faught.


16 posted on 03/19/2013 7:29:54 AM PDT by wyowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
There are two outcomes to consider:

Iraq as Bush left it in 2008;

Iraq as Obama "transformed" it since he took the reins;

I believe in 2008, Iraq had a better than 50% chance of becoming a free, modern, pro-American state.

After Obama, he flushed all such hopes down the toilet, just as he's doing in Afghanistan.

17 posted on 03/19/2013 7:30:49 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Palin was correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No! It was not worth it. Nothing in that part of the World is worth our trying to save. We fought because Iraq invaded Kuwait and was killing just for the fun of it. It was a UN war! Forgot that? And we were the main Country in the UN. Iraq under Hussein was a cruel inhumane Country.


20 posted on 03/19/2013 7:32:01 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When George W. Bush came into office, he spoke against “nation building”, but after the Iraq War, that’s exactly what we got bogged down in. We should’ve collected war reparations and let Iraq figure out how to recover. It would have amounted to the same results we have today and we wouldn’t have lost as many troops and so much money.


24 posted on 03/19/2013 7:36:24 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (It's not "GUN CONTROL"! It's "PEOPLE CONTROL"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Would’ve helped if we’d conducted the war correctly. Our mistake was deciding world opinion was more important than our own well-being.


25 posted on 03/19/2013 7:36:35 AM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m sure that war will start paying for itself any day now.


28 posted on 03/19/2013 7:50:03 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We went to war because someone dared insult George Bush Sr. He had a personal hatred for Sadam and Noreiga. I believe we went to war because Bush needed to smash something. Bush Sr. showed his feelings toward these two men and I was shocked at how personal it became to him. Not a healthy way to lead a country.


29 posted on 03/19/2013 7:50:42 AM PDT by Ramonne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I remember on the day our troops rolled into Baghdad, there was a large Iraqi taking a sledge hammer to the base of a Saddam statue. A US tank eventually pulled it down, and the Iraquis dragged the head of the statue behind a truck.

I felt so proud, and thought here we go again – America bringing freedom to the oppressed.

I was so wrong. Islam and liberty are not compatible. There will be no peace or progress in the Middle East until the EVIL of Islam is eradicated.

30 posted on 03/19/2013 7:53:48 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It is too soon to know if it was worth it.
It could be the spark that changes the course of events in the middle east or it could be just another wasted effort.
Check back in about 100 years and it will be obvious to everybody.
32 posted on 03/19/2013 8:01:28 AM PDT by oldbrowser (They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

WWII was worth it. Since then, not one declared war, just misguided adventures in policing, nation building and ludicrous rules of engagement, wasting our troops and treasure at the bidding of Globalists.

I played a small part in the Vietnam fiasco - color me appropriately jaded, but don’t “thank me for my service” - if I served anybody at all, it was not you, nor this country, but the dark powers that have now taken our country to its ruin.


34 posted on 03/19/2013 8:05:16 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Iraq was payback by Dubya for Sadaam Hussein’s attempt to assasinate Bush 41.

Basically Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attackss - 9/11 was just used as an excuse.

It was not only a mistake to invade Iraq - it was poorly conceived and executed at high levels.

In the almost 12 years since 9/11, under republican and democrat presidents, we have spent trillions of dollars, cost the lives of thousands of our finest military men and women, and made the mid-east more militantly muslim and more anti-American.

Who says bi-patisanship is dead?


36 posted on 03/19/2013 8:11:02 AM PDT by Iron Munro (I miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Not without having taken the saudis and iranians down first.


38 posted on 03/19/2013 8:34:30 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The second Iraq war wouldn’t have been necessary if we had finished the first one back during the first Bush presidency.

It was no less than Colin Powell who put the kibosh on that one. Norman Schwarzkopf wanted to keep going, perhaps all the way to Baghdad, but Powell argued to President G.H.W. Bush that they stop prematurely. Schwarzkopf later commented that Powell “had no stomach” for war.

After the World Trade Center attack, Bush II probably reckoned he had to do _something_ as a show of force against “terrorism”, and Afghanistan wasn’t going to be “enough”. So, we got “Iraq II”.

I foresaw years ago that toppling both regimes would really gain little in the true struggle in which we are engaged. It should be obvious now that our efforts there were little more than wasted, particularly in Afghanistan (which will be back under taliban control before too long). All they had to do was “wait us out” until we just got tired of being there.

The problem with the struggle with islam is that we are not involved in a war with any existing national “government”, per se. Our struggle is with _something else_. Most here know what the “something else” actually is. Most leaders of The West are desparate to deny this truth.

Also, removing any particular individual (or more than one) from power will do little to change things — because the actual leader of the forces against which we are aligned has been dead for 1,400 years. Yet he still controls more than a billion of his “soldiers” through his “operational field manual” — the quran.

This is why the other side is winning.
It’s also why it will continue to win, so long as The West refuses to confront the realities before us….


39 posted on 03/19/2013 8:50:10 AM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson