Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
BJK: "...after rejecting constitutional methods for seceding."

central_va: "No such thing."

  1. Neither the Constitution nor any Federal law describes methods for lawful secession.

  2. No Founder expressly approved unilateral secession "at pleasure", meaning without some "oppression" or "injury" making secession "necessary".

  3. Neither outgoing Democrat President Buchanan nor incoming Republican President Lincoln agreed that states' unilateral secession "at pleasure" was lawful.

  4. No act of Congress in 1861 approved secession.

  5. No court ruled that any state had a material legal beef against the Federal government.

  6. Therefore, no law told either President Buchanan or Lincoln they were relieved from enforcing Federal laws in seceding states.

In short, neither our Founders nor the two presidents of that time would agree that 1860-61 secessionists unilateral actions were constitutional or lawful.

732 posted on 03/20/2013 2:05:37 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
In short, neither our Founders nor the two presidents of that time would agree that 1860-61 secessionists unilateral actions were constitutional or lawful.

Oh yeah, George Washington would have sided with Lincoln. BWAHAAAAAAAAA!

737 posted on 03/20/2013 3:07:54 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 732 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson