Posted on 03/01/2013 12:45:17 AM PST by UKrepublican
(Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron's ruling Conservative party was humiliated in an election in England on Friday after it was defeated by a scandal-ridden coalition partner and pushed into third place by an anti-EU party.
(Excerpt) Read more at uk.reuters.com ...
It’s hard to grasp that a guy named Nigel Farage is such a political stud!
He’s the Chuck Norris of sarcasm. ;^)
In the sense that the U.S. can ignore Brussels, but can't ignore itself, yes.
I noticed that you completely ignored that the New world order globalists have been supporting communism ever since Stalin.
Yeah, because it's a stupid comment.
They are talking about a “free trade” deal between the USA and the EU at this very moment!
The Conservative party didn’t earn their vote, its that simple
If it wasn’t Bronco Obama doing it, and say, Ronald Reagan . . . I’d be ecstatic.
Excellent thanks for the link, I hope he wins!
Yes, but protectionists (by way of tariffs) who advocate for simplified or eliminated income taxes, returning the power to mint gold and silver currency to the Congress, returning the election of Senators to the various state legislatures, and clear rules for reigning in government power are philosophically no different than our Founding Fathers. NOW you got it.
Let hear from the man himself, Karl Marx
"But, in general, the protective system of our day is conservative, while the free trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade."
How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
--Ronald Reagan
I wonder how many “get” the XTC reference.
Bet you had your Senses Working Overtime to come up with that one.
Yes, he should have said "fascist" and I'm sure that would have made you happier.
There are risks with unrestricted trade among nations, whether losing key military industries, accepting pathogens and pests across borders, or penetration by terrorists and spies. You wish to socialize those risks while privatizing the benefits.
That's fascism.
From W. Cleon Skousen's famous list of communist goals (with thanks to FReeper forest):
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
Industries essential to national security must be protected. Even Milton Friedman understood. As for pathogens, pests, terrorists, and spies, I’d like to see you explain how placing tariffs on them helps.
Wouldn’t it be great if Nigel got elected PM. I love that guy. I wish he could run for President here. He would likely have won all 3 presidential debates decisively.
I love the common sense expressed in the video. As to the union of right-side parties, that’s what Canada did, and why they are the only major economy in good shape today.
On the other hand, American Tea Partiers want a divorce from the Republicans, saying that the constant back-stabbing by the liberal country-clubbers is intolerable. The Constitution Party is the alternative, but only a major party in Colorado.
P.S. I think Daniel Hannan would be a great PM.
Is there a web site for this party?
Never mind, I found it: ukip.org
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.