Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
From my link in 35

Abortion Issues
2013 Planned Parenthood - Positions 33%
2012 Planned Parenthood - Positions 33%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%

Paul is very much pro-life, you should take a look at the link I posted in 35.

39 posted on 03/02/2013 3:42:23 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb

Did you read his recent statement here on FR about getting rid of social conservative principles to attract voters?

Ron Paul also said he was “pro-life” but also that abortion should be up to the states.

That means he’s not pro-life. And for Rand Paul to have a 33% positive rating from Planned Parenthood is certainly damning him with faint praise. That means 1/3 of the time he votes the way PP likes. Pretty poor rating. Someone may make statements about how pro-life he is, but if he wants to “soften up” on it, or make it a states’ rights issue, to gain votes - then he’s lost mine, and a host of other actual, real conservatives.

Why Rs think that being more LIKE the dems is a winning position I cannot grasp. They are totally wrong. In order to win, they should actually stand up for the Constitution and real conservative principles.

His voting for Hagel and the reason proves his quality as well.


40 posted on 03/02/2013 8:25:42 AM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson