How is that different than saying, "I said that trigger locks or a gun safe would have prevent him from having access to his MOMS gun"?
I haven't understood this exchange between you and Lee's Ghost. How can anyone disagree it was foolish of his mother to not secure her weapons so that at least, it would be as difficult as possible for him to get to them?
It seems you are disagreeing with the contention she was a foolish steward of her guns. If so, how? Do you not believe she at least shares some of the responsibility for the tragedy?
How much more simply and plainly can I make it?
Laws, trigger locks and gun safes will NOT prevent a cold blooded, premeditated murderer from violence against innocent defenseless people.
If you figure this guy out please let me know. I’ve come to the conclusion that he is as dumb as a post.