I almost answered this, thinking you were Mr Rogers, who I addressed the question to. You, BG, won’t even acknowledge that Lind said Joseph Stalin could be President and it would be “irrelevant” to the lawfulness of Lakin’s orders. So you haven’t even met the requirement of honesty required for me to engage with you.
I’ll wait for Mr Rogers to respond, either on the board or privately.
“You, BG, won’t even acknowledge that Lind said Joseph Stalin could be President and it would be “irrelevant” to the lawfulness of Lakin’s orders.”
__
LOL, you are lying again! Take another look at Post 208, in which I said, “For the record, I agree with you.”
The truth means nothing to you, that’s clear. Maybe you’re too emotionally worked up to see clearly.