Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

“So then how did they know about the shotgun at 9:55:25 on the police scanner???

How did they know that there was a shotgun if it was still in the trunk and they hadn’t looked in there???”

Again, the scanner does specifically identify the location of the shotgun. It does not specifically AT ANY TIME mention they are searching the car.

There is more than one explanation for that comment INCLUDING that he was wrong with the comment.

But I don’t rule out that they popped the trunk to look for a child inside AT SOME POINT but not before they first went inside the building. At that time they were dealing with an active shooter.

I have said this over and over and over and over that it is possible that they popped the trunk to look inside for a child BUT NOT TO THOROUGHLY SEARCH THE TRUNK.

I think they could get that act through the court system with no problem.

What I do not believe they did is what you claim they did and IF they did...they were bungling fools.

You may need to prosecute MULTIPLE people in a mass murder. You do not toss clothing evidence over a car door to the front of the car onto the pavement AS THE SHOOTER IS INSIDE A BUILDING SHOOTING AT KIDS. If you do, YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

Which begs the question of why you keep trying to force a narrative that makes them look like fools.


235 posted on 02/07/2013 4:56:40 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
There is more than one explanation for that comment INCLUDING that he was wrong with the comment.

So you are accusing them of lying.

237 posted on 02/07/2013 5:05:17 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
I have said this over and over and over and over that it is possible that they popped the trunk to look inside for a child BUT NOT TO THOROUGHLY SEARCH THE TRUNK.

So then without your search warrant they could SEARCH BUT NOT THOROUGHLY SEARCH THE TRUNK???

Did they have to keep one eye closed as they searched -- and maybe just use one hand???

How does that work???

If you see a shotgun during the NOT THOROUGH SEARCH, do you pretend that it isn't there???

238 posted on 02/07/2013 5:14:54 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
Which begs the question of why you keep trying to force a narrative that makes them look like fools.

It doesn't make them look foolish in the least.

No evidence was tainted, police who followed could see that the vehicle had been searched, and the black sweatshirts probably needed to be shaken out to make sure there was nothing in them.

Did you want them to fold them neatly and put them back???

However your accusing them of lying on the police scanner about the shotgun is ... beneath contempt ... but par for you.

240 posted on 02/07/2013 5:34:11 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson