It was not a controversial position on a social issue, it was the awkward words they choose to describe the position.
No. It was kinda controversial in that Akin said, “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something: I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be of the rapist, and not attacking the child.”
The rape victim’s body “has ways to try to shut that whole thing down?!?” Um...yeah...
That said, I think we do need to be a bit more careful who we pick to represent us. Our candidates need to be better prepared for the intense media scrutiny that’s solely reserved for Republicans. We want conservatives, but they better be prepared to wisely articulate their positions in a hostile environment.
Correcto. Ive often been critical of some of my “social issue” friend’s methods. Awkward wording and falling for traps set by RATS and RINOs and following scum like the Huckster have always hurt the cause.
I dont know whats wrong with plain statements from candidates.