Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

http://www.nysrpa.org/files/SAFENoticeOfClaim.pdf

Copy of filing.

1 posted on 01/29/2013 3:47:05 PM PST by GlockThe Vote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GlockThe Vote

1 of I hope millions!

Flood the system!


2 posted on 01/29/2013 3:51:30 PM PST by freedumb2003 (I learned everything I needed to know about racism from Colin Powell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GlockThe Vote

Very straightforward filing. Mostly cites the 14th Amendment.

Seeks injunctive relief from the law and a declaration it is unconstitutional

I especially liked the complaint about the law being too broad and vague. ;-)


4 posted on 01/29/2013 4:03:06 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GlockThe Vote
I hope people in NY oppose the 7 round capacity exemption for law enforcement. If 7 rounds is good enough for the common citizen, it should be good enough for law enforcement.

Why should law enforcement have an advantage over common citizens?

6 posted on 01/29/2013 4:05:50 PM PST by rllngrk33 (Things will continue getting worse until at least January 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GlockThe Vote
Clickable link: http://www.nysrpa.org/files/SAFENoticeOfClaim.pdf
7 posted on 01/29/2013 4:07:53 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GlockThe Vote
Excellent !!
9 posted on 01/29/2013 4:12:19 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Obama has turned America into an aristocracy of the unaccomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GlockThe Vote

FWIW, this is not a lawsuit and it has not been “filed”.

It is merely a notice of intention to file a lawsuit. It was directed to the State Attorney General and not to any court.


14 posted on 01/29/2013 4:50:26 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GlockThe Vote

Copy/paste from the pdf file:
-
II. NATURE OF CLAIM(S)
Plaintiffs claim that passage and enforcement of the aforementioned legislation:

A. violates their fundamental constitutional rights to lawfully possess, keep, bear and
use firearms for self-defense and other lawful purposes;

B. violates their constitutional rights to privacy;

C. impermissibly interferes with and infringes upon their fundamental constitutional
rights to travel both intra-state and inter-state with lawfully possessed firearms;

D. unconstitutionally criminalizes and bans the possession of certain firearms,
ammunition and large capacity feeding devices that were legally possessed prior by plaintiffs prior
to the legislation’s passage and enforcement, and in which the plaintiff’s had a cognizable property
feeding devices amounts to a deprivation and taking of them by the State of New York under color
of law and without due process or just compensation. As such, passage and enforcement of the NY
SAFE Act effectuates an unconstitutional taking of private property under the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments to the U.S. Constitution;

E. unlawfully and unconstitutionally imposes restrictions on the ability of the plaintiffs
to conduct business on both inter-state and intra-state levels with the designers of, manufacturers of,
sellers of, distributors of, and purchasers of certain firearms, ammunition, and large capacity
interest. The outright criminalization and ban of these firearms, ammunition and large capacity
feeding devices, all in violation of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution;

F. deprives the plaintiffs of life, liberty and/or property without due process of law, in
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;

G. deprives the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws, in violation of the
Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;

H. was passed and is being continuously enforced with the ongoing tortious intent to
harass, harm, impede, interfere with, disrupt, interrupt, and/or destroy the present and future
business and commercial activities of those plaintiffs who engage in the design of, manufacture of,
distribution of, sale of, possession of, and/or training in the safe and lawful use of firearms,
ammunition, and/or large capacity feeding devices; and

I. the legislation is impermissibly vague and overbroad.


16 posted on 01/29/2013 5:20:47 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson