I didn't call you a name. I said you weren't interested in evidence. Your original post makes it clear that you're ignorant of how much evidence there is and don't understand what you do know about. And you seem to like it that way.
If you gave any sign of having read #49 and comprehended it, and tried to rebut it in a serious way, it might be worth presenting you with other evidence. Somehow I don't think that's gonna happen.
More name calling, well done. I read 49 and quoted from it. It is a bunch of evolutionists who were lukewarm that they couldn’t prove it true but would not confirm the fraud. Even they admitted the skeptics could be right about the fraud, that’s the best you have is a paper by Darwinists agreeing a fraud was not a fraud?
You are worshiping a religion called atheism and won’t admit it for pride.
Pray for America