[stormer]

Why would Wikipedia want to take the conodont (not conodate) off their list? The hoax you've so cleverly used as evidence disputing the Theory of Evolution has nothing to do with the validity of the cladistics of conodonts, but only that someone was lying about the provenance of some fossils. And how was this fraud detected? Why through science, of course. By demonstrating that the geological setting claimed could not have produced those remains, evolutionary theory is strengthened, not weakened. Care to play again?

[bray]

Let’s get this straight, the more frauds and fakes found in evolution the stronger evolution becomes. By the looks of it evolution is really really strong by your definition.

Yes, let’s play although your mind has long been made up so no amount of fraud or fakes will shake your faith in atheism.

Pray for America