[Nip]

I find Emperor Obama’s current stance on civilians owning “assault weapons” very interesting. My only question is he lying now? Or did he lie back in June 2008? There is no question that he is lying its just a question of which one?

Why June 2008?

Because on July 2, 2008 at an open speech at Colorado Springs, CO then candidate Obama propose a “Civilian National Defense Force” because; “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Taking him at his freely expressed word, a dangerous thing to do with any politician, this would mean civilians would have access to full automatic individual weapons, crew served weapons from small mortars to large caliber field guns, tanks, attack helicopters, fighters, bombers, and naval warships that are at least equal to what is currently operated by the DoD.

Am I the only one, other than World Net Daily, that remembers this speech?

I wonder if any pro Second Amendment person would have the guts to bring this up during an interview?

[Slyfox]

You make some very interesting points. As far as The BFLAN lying about it, well we have to concede that he is allergic to virtue.

He prefers to make his actions LOOK virtuous, so as to fool the fools.

I do remember thinking at the time he made that comment as a candidate thinking "why didn't he just use the words 'a well-regulated militia'?

He has no desire to allow us our Constitutional rights.

He wants a group who is well-regulated by him to do us in.

Bill Ayers said that their goal is to destroy the American Republic.

Only savage beasts talk like that.