Did I mention she was hard of hearing? Where is the original summons? Perhaps it listed the wrong place for her to show. Are the original judge and bailiff available for witnesses to the no-show? Did I mention she suffers from amnesia? The American Disabilities Act is supposed to protect people from such injustice as this.
Oh come on, now you're really reaching, and you know it. Even if she were, our system is indeed setup to deal with offenders who are stone deaf.
Where is the original summons?
You can bet that a copy is still on file.
Are the original judge and bailiff available for witnesses to the no-show?
Who cares? They don't need to be. Court transcripts are held as indisputable evidence. So much so that courts of review admit no evidence, accept no testimony, but instead rule entirely based on the transcript of the lower court.
Did I mention she suffers from amnesia?
And I'm sure you can prove that. Or maybe you shouldn't, as her diminished capacity would certainly disqualify her from meaningful employment with a defense contractor such as Pratt and Whitney.
Face dude. You were wrong, you know you were wrong, but you just don't want to publicly acknowledge for whatever personal reason you may have. Since you've obviously backed off from the preposterous notion that Wal-Mart can somehow be sued over this, I'm just going to let this be my last reply.