“What are “they” investigating?”
A mass murder.
“If everything that we have been told is true then what is the use of withholding evidence? Video, witnesses, autopsies, etc. etc.?”
Nobody is withholding any evidence, as far as I know. Withholding evidence means that you have evidence which you are keeping from the proper authorities. You are not the proper authority, so just because they haven’t shown you the videos or autopsy reports doesn’t mean that anyone is withholding evidence.
“As I remember after 9/11 if anything was found out during the investigation then the press was all over it. With this there is no reporting, basically none, about anything being investigated.”
Different investigations are handled differently. Sometimes, a lot of information is released to the press during the course of the investigation, and sometimes, hardly anything at all. It’s all up to the discretion of the investigating body, whether that be the police, the District Attorney, or some special commission. If they choose not to release all the evidence within the first few weeks of an investigation, it does NOT constitute any evidence for a conspiracy, since it is not unusual at all.
“According to the govt. narrative the lone shooter is dead. What are they gonna do? Try him for murder? There is no reason to investigate if the authorities have been upfront so far.”
All the 9/11 terrorists died in the attack, and yet we still had to do an investigation. There is always an investigation for any homicide, even if the suspected murderer dies while committing their crimes. Conspiracy theorists are pushing the idea that there are multiple shooters, but for all you know that is one of the things that they are investigating at this very moment! You have no way of knowing that, or the results of any such investigation, because you are too impatient to wait for the investigation to conclude before spouting your half-cocked theories.
“Conspiracy theorists are pushing the idea that there are multiple shooters, but for all you know that is one of the things that they are investigating at this very moment! “
So then why is it a “conspiracy” theory if there is evidence to suggest that it is a possibility. It doesn’t mean there were multiple shooters. It means was there evidence to suggest that there might have been.
“What are “they” investigating?”
“A mass murder”
If the story that the authorities are pushing is true then why investigate? Lone shooter, he’s dead.
“Conspiracy theorists are pushing the idea that there are multiple shooters, but for all you know that is one of the things that they are investigating at this very moment!”
So, first you say that if anybody says there was more than one shooter then they are Conspiracy theorists. Then you say “that may be one of the things they are investigating.”
I mean, which is it? Are you a conspiracy theorist? How can you say you’re a nutter for suggesting that there maybe more than one shooter and then say that maybe the reason they are not releasing much, if any info may be because they are investigating more than one shooter?
Sorry, that doesn’t make any sense.