Posted on 01/03/2013 4:55:46 PM PST by Red in Blue PA
No grandfather. No possession. No registration. B-felony. Same as Rape 1 or Manslaughter 1.
(Excerpt) Read more at open.nysenate.gov ...
No compliance. No mercy. No quarter.
It has to be a semi automatic, that mossberg should be fine, no?
ping
S1422-2013 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
1422
2013-2014 Regular Sessions
I N SENATE
(PREFILED)
January 9, 2013
The goal is always the same: 30 to 10 to 7 to “five or six”, to 3 to 1 to NONE.
Mayor Bloomberg Blasts NRA: ‘Connecticut Is Because of Some of Their Actions’
...
But if he had his preference, Bloomberg said he would go farther than the 1994 ban and outlaw all automatic and semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines. The mayor said magazines shouldn’t be allowed to contain more than five or six rounds.
“If you haven’t hit the deer with three shots, you’re a pretty lousy shot. The deer deserves to get away,” he said....
link: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bloomberg-blasts-nra-connecticut-actions/story?id=18029157
"pistol grip" and "shroud" would be interpreted to cover an M1A1 and an M1 carbine. Note also that they propose increased penalties if the citizen owns two to nine other Non prohibited firearms.
On the other hand, there apparently is a grandfather clause under tight restrictions (some of which are not clear in the proposed act...it's at para. S3)
Got a link to this supposed "MSM" news report?
Unless a Bushmaster has a charging handle on the side and shoots shotgun shells, the weapon recovered from the trunk is clearly not a Bushmaster.
I guess I’m going to jail
I live in this stupid state. F all of these communist thugs
“Anyone seen the MSM news report that was evidently presented last Fri or Sat stating that the Bushmaster was indeed left in the trunk “
Got links? I think the medical examiner said all wounds were .223.
__________________________________
It doesn't say that at all. It limits the number of rounds in any such to ten. And lists features that in addition to the ten rd mag would make it an 'assault weapon'.
This is essentially the old AWB vis a vis weapon description.
The over-reach is making possession of more than two firearms a felony.
It will go nowhere.
What if I haven’t hit the dumbass politician after 3 shots, Mr. Bloomberg? Can’t I have a few more shots?
Yes, that would be illegal under this proposed law.
I lot of us care. What do we do? Keep calling your reps, yea but they will never stop.
________________________________
Not a SCOTUS with two more obama picks.
Write and call your congresscritters.
Join the NRA.
Join the GOA.
Take others shooting.
Buy all you can to support the gun industry and show them how much firepower they are up against.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nope. It says that they must be turned in, destroyed or rendered inoperable, even if they were legally owned prior to January 2014.
Go after them before they come after you !
Nevertheless, it is important to recognize the enemy and be prepared to act should the time come. Some specifics are in post #12. Find a picture and memorize the face.
As a lawyer - i am planning my long game.
I am going to send a certified letter to the journal newsto start as well as their insurance carrier putting them on notice for potential tort claims as a result of their negligence.
No grandfather. No possession. No registration. B-felony. Same as Rape 1 or Manslaughter 1.
If it is prosecuted and punished the same as rape and manslaughter, there’s nothing to worry about. Just ignore it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.