Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

“Absolutely. I know it sounds ridiculous, but don’t forget that back in the 1930s it was (around) $21 an ounce. No one would ever have believed that 80 years later we would have gold trading anywhere near $1,900 an ounce, but that’s what happened. “

I really really wish that those who start talking dollars would talk in terms of a constant dollar. Twentynine 1930 dollars vs 1900 2012 dollars?


15 posted on 12/29/2012 9:10:32 AM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TalBlack

Constant dollars are tricky over many years. Search engines yield many attempts.

An ounce of gold historically bought a very good men’s suit, or somewhat less than a monthly wage for a low-level employee.

Looks like those prices are still comparable.


17 posted on 12/29/2012 9:26:56 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: TalBlack

yes, gold is the measure.

in the current context, $21/troy ounce in the 30’s now is
say $1650/troy ounce.

Gold is the constant, the $ is the variable.

mwasures


24 posted on 12/29/2012 1:31:57 PM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson