The idea of “need” is what bothers me most about your question. When did we insert “need” into Constitutional Rights? They are Rights, not privileges or requests. Driving is a privilege, having a telephone is a privilege, being able to watch TV is a privilege. These and other privileges are not given to you by the Constitution.
You have the right to Free Speech, to Free choice of religion, to have a trial by a jury of your peers, you have the right to be secure in your home.
Now, is there a “need” for justifying the Rights listed above? If some think so, then maybe we are doomed.
Rights do not carry a “need” to be accepted , they are a “Demand” to be accepted.
I didn't think about that, but that is an excellent point.