Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

No it isn’t. It was made in the knowledge that educators, most likely most educators aren’t capable of dealing with a pistol, don’t want to learn and it is not their job.

It has nothing to do with those who know their weapons stuff and are qualified and legal. The chip om your shoulder is falling off it seems.


59 posted on 12/23/2012 10:32:25 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: bert
No it isn’t. It was made in the knowledge that educators, most likely most educators aren’t capable of dealing with a pistol, don’t want to learn and it is not their job.

Number one rule when you find yourself in a hole is to stop digging.

What makes you think that ALL educators will be FORCED to carry firearms and aren't capable of dealing with it? What about those who VOLUNTEER and have the training? No, there's never been a former military type to take up teaching. No, there isn't a single teacher in the country with a CCW license (don't tell that to my CPL holding teacher wife.)

You're showing your ignorance with such broadly sweeping remarks. Will they cover the majority of teachers? No doubt. Does it apply to ALL teachers? No, by at least one teacher in my household. How many armed teachers does a single school need? Any number >zero.

63 posted on 12/23/2012 11:38:54 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson