She is waiting for the Benghazi report to be issued so she can have a story that at least tries to match some of the facts.
Unfortunately, she lied from the beginning - blaming the video - and refused additional requested security.
Do I have this right.
The incumbent who failed to provide the requested security and then lied about the attack for twelve days is still in the position?
But the person who the wh sent out with false info withdrew her name in shame?