Replies

There was a case somewhere, last week, where the wife called in about her husband making a threat of some kind- and they came in and took all of his weapons and ammo.

Hillary did that -- the Violence Against Women Act (unconstitutional on its face, since it makes law for Paul that it doesn't make for Paula) provides for instantaneous, procedureless and rightless felonization of a citizen. A magistrate swings a gavel to grant a Temporary Restraining Order, and bang! The subject of the TRO is a felon, if he owns a firearm.

That's what his dragon of an ex-wife did to Dr. Emerson, the Amarillo dentist, whose case fell off the radar after it was returned by SCOTUS for a "do-over and this time find him guilty" to the U.S. District Court for northern Texas after the judge had resoundingly found Emerson innocent and the VAWA unconstitutional, and then the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans held up their opinion for two years waiting on election results before convicting him on appeal (basically). That was such a roust .... and SCOTUS did it, let all of us recent admirers of Heller remember.

Footnote: Slick and Beastwoman had selected Dr. Emerson's case, to establish precedential case law for VAWA. It was to be the VAWA's equivalent of FDR's picking on a cripple in U.S. vs. Miller (1939), in which FDR sicced his solicitor general on a defense brief that had no advocate, in a case in which one of the defendants was dead and the other a penniless prison inmate, lawyerless save for the resigned author of the brief.

That's apparently why Fifth Circuit temporized so outrageously ... one did not wish to cross the coldly vindictive Beastwoman, y'know.