Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So Long to ‘The Big E’(inactivated today)
PJ Media ^ | 12-1-2012 | Rick Moran

Posted on 12/01/2012 7:09:10 PM PST by smoothsailing

December 1, 2012

So Long to ‘The Big E’

Rick Moran

For five decades, the nuclear powered aircraft carrier Enterprise plowed the seven seas to protect the freedoms of American citizens and guarantee freedom of the seas for all. From the Cuban missile crisis through its participation in conflicts arising out of the 9/11 attacks, “The Big ‘E’” was the tip of the spear of American foreign policy.

Today, in front of 12,000 former crew, their families, and friends, the United States Navy formally retired Enterprise from active service.

Reuters:

The 1,123-foot (342-metres) long Enterprise was commissioned in 1961 with eight nuclear reactors on board, and the next year was deployed to participate in a blockade of Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Since then, it has played a role in a number of naval missions, including deployments to Vietnam and to the Middle East as part of the U.S. response to the September 11, 2001, attacks. It returned from its final deployment about a month ago, said Navy spokesman Mike Maus.

Nicknamed the “Big E,” the Enterprise was the oldest active duty ship in the U.S. Naval fleet, according to the military, and was the eighth U.S. military ship to bear the name Enterprise.

The roughly 12,000 people who participated in the ceremony for the USS Enterprise include many former crew members and their friends, Maus said. The ceremony was held in Virginia at Naval Station Norfolk.

The Enterprise will stay at Naval Station Norfolk for several months and then will move to a shipyard in nearby Newport News, Virginia, where its nuclear fuel will be removed from the vessel, Maus said.

After that, the ship will be towed to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Washington state, where its nuclear reactors will be dismantled and the Enterprise will be scrapped, Maus said.

There are no plans to turn the Enterprise into a museum, as has been done with other historic warships.

The Navy said in a statement that inactivation and defueling of the Enterprise will have “major impacts on the structure of the ship” and that it would be too costly to “return the ship to a condition that would support it becoming a museum.”

Even today, Enterprise was an impressive weapon of war. Its 8 nuclear reactors powered the ship to speeds up to 34 knots. It carried a crew of 5,000 seamen and airmen and up to 90 aircraft. It was the longest naval vessel in the world in its time, displacing nearly 95,000 tons — a truly fearsome manifestation of American power.

Enterprise
was the second oldest commissioned warship in the US Navy, superseded only by the three masted frigate Constitution. She and her crew have much to be proud having served this nation with honor and courage for so long.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: cvn65; usnavy; ussenterprise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: SkyDancer

The practice of naming ships after presidents needs to end. The next flattop should be another Enterprise. Then every carrier after that should rturn to being named after revolutionary war battles.

Enough of the memorials to fat farting potentates that everyone wants to forget anyway.


21 posted on 12/01/2012 7:34:38 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

What a wonderful experience that must have been! Good for your Dad! :)


22 posted on 12/01/2012 7:35:00 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Right - the the submarine named after Jimmah Carter? The USS Peanut????


23 posted on 12/01/2012 7:38:02 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

he also took us to The Battleship Massachusetts, a bunch of WW2 Ships in mothballs , and a submarine!

he was SUCH a cool guy!


24 posted on 12/01/2012 7:38:55 PM PST by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I’m a big fan of WWII Pacific naval battles. Bring back names like “The Bunker Hill”, etc. Although I think the Ben Franklin was a good name for that carrier. But there was the Yorktown too. But politicians as they are will name things after themselves. Wish the Navy had a septic system tanker they could name “The Obama” ....


25 posted on 12/01/2012 7:41:07 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Wow! that picture evoked a memory too! :-)


26 posted on 12/01/2012 7:41:58 PM PST by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Yep,, and the USS Obama will come before he even leaves office. Reagan deserved it. But it’s time this practice stopped until we have a Saratoga, a Yorkown, a Constitution, and Enterprise, etc.

Our personality cult of the presidency is beginning to suck.


27 posted on 12/01/2012 7:46:07 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Agree! Make the Reagan the last one only because he brought back the Navy that Carter decimated during his term.


28 posted on 12/01/2012 7:47:38 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; SkyDancer
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, in a video played towards the end of the ceremony, announced that CVN 80, third ship of the new GERALD R. FORD-class carriers, will be named ENTERPRISE, thus becoming the ninth American naval ship to bear the name.


A graphic showing what the future USS ENTERPRISE (CVN 80) is expected to look like when she joins the fleet after 2025. The aircraft are F-35C Lighting II Joint Strike Fighters, F/A-18 E and F Super Hornet strike fighters, E-2D Hawkeye electronic warfare planes, and an unmanned strike jet modeled on the X-47B sitting on the No. 4 catapult. (U.S. Navy)

29 posted on 12/01/2012 7:51:09 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Oh, how I would love to navigate this big azz from Nofuk to Seeasstle.

Maybe go around the Cape for fun!

30 posted on 12/01/2012 7:52:27 PM PST by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

A new ENTERPRISE... that is cool


31 posted on 12/01/2012 7:52:49 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Yea!!!!!


32 posted on 12/01/2012 7:53:36 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

And Franklin getting a carrier was great! And it was 150 years after his era. It was clearly named after him because he deserved it, and not as an honor bestowed to help ensure the ship project never met with a budget cut.

The USS GHW Bush was ordered the week George W Bush was sworn in. Does anyone believe thats a coincidence? And i know he was a pilot. But as a president he was clueless. Would the American people of 150 years hence look back, and think of him the way people in 1941 thought of Franklin? I doubt it.


33 posted on 12/01/2012 7:54:17 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Build a bigger better Enterprise CV-6b


34 posted on 12/01/2012 7:55:54 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I read about the sea battle where the Franklin was hit over and over again with those Kamakasi planes. Although I’m a bit clueless over naming one carrier the Wasp (it was sunk). What was that all about?


35 posted on 12/01/2012 7:56:44 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
The practice of naming ships after presidents needs to end. The next flattop should be another Enterprise. Then every carrier after that should rturn to being named after revolutionary war battles.

The next three CVNs have been named:

CVN-78 will be the USS Gerald R. Ford.

CVN-79 will be the USS John F. Kennedy.

CVN-80 will be ... the USS ENTERPRISE.

This last per the Secretary of the Navy speaking via video at the inactivation ceremony this afternoon. He said he couldn't stop CVN-65s retirement, but he could ensure that her legacy and the legacy of all previous Enterprises lived on. CVN-80 is slated for commissioning in 2025, to replace the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)
36 posted on 12/01/2012 7:57:48 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Thats good news! Just hope it survives the Obama vendetta and actually gets built.


37 posted on 12/01/2012 7:57:48 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Hopefully some jerk politician won’t cancel the funds for it. We have to be nice to the world and not be so militaristic. /sarc


38 posted on 12/01/2012 7:58:18 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Here’s a link to an excellent article about the Enterprise ceremony today. Bunch of nifty pics and info!

http://blogs.defensenews.com/intercepts/2012/12/carrier-enterprise-cvn-65-leaves-the-fleet-but-the-name-lives-on/


39 posted on 12/01/2012 7:59:01 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
A graphic showing what the future USS ENTERPRISE (CVN 80) is expected to look like when she joins the fleet after 2025.

Hopefully she won't be carrying the first carrier Hornet's service number on her bow. ;-)
40 posted on 12/01/2012 8:00:31 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson