This is BULLSHIT.
No civil consent order can vitiate the reporting and the apprehension of alleged criminal fraud.
Once the probable cause for electoral fraud is set out, then a criminal investigation ensues, regardless of whether the RNC can have supervisors and scrutineers at polls or not.
Secondly, the RNC consent order does not apply to the Tea Party. And you can bet right now that the Tea Party is ready to assume the duty that the RNC has relinquished by consent order.
The GOP is dead anyway.Let the T Party begin and have its own life. There is no better reason for it that the RNCs electoral sell out via a 1982 consent order.
” This is BULLSHIT.
No civil consent order can vitiate the reporting and the apprehension of alleged criminal fraud.”
You saw it, and I’m not surprised it was you who did.
“The GOP is dead anyway.Let the T Party begin and have its own life. There is no better reason for it that the RNCs electoral sell out via a 1982 consent order.”
Can’t argue with you there.
It's the article which is bullshit. The consent decree says nothing about monitoring or reporting ballot fraud.
“Once the probable cause for electoral fraud is set out, then a criminal investigation ensues...”
Only if you can find a prosecuting attorney to act or a judge that will hear the case. If the Democrats have that all lock-up you’re probably out of luck.