Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Next Oil Revolution
Energy Tribune ^ | November 17, 2012 | Peter C Glover

Posted on 11/17/2012 9:08:10 PM PST by neverdem

The Next Oil Revolution

By Peter C Glover

Far from running out of oil, new studies confirm the world is headed for the next oil revolution with growing US production playing an nascent role. And, as with the unconventional shale gas revolution, nearly all new unconventional oil development is taking place despite pre-election White House energy polices through development on private, rather than on federal, lands.

A new IHS CERA group study America’s New Energy Future: The Unconventional Oil and Gas Revolution and the US Economy, spells out how unconventional oil and gas production in the US is changing the US energy landscape and contributing significant economic growth, job creation and federal revenues. The report shows how the unconventional oil and gas sector will support over 1.7 million jobs at higher than average wages. That figure is anticipated to increase to 2.5 million by 2015 and 3.5 million by 2035.

According to IHS vice chairman Daniel Yergin, “The United States currently has the highest rate of growth in crude oil production capacity in the world” while being “virtually self-sufficient in gas, except for some from Canada.” All a stark contrast to the doom and gloom predictions envisioning a heavy dependence on oil and gas imports just a few years ago. Yergin points out how the growth of unconventional oil and gas capacity, “is creating a new energy reality for the United States” that has “contributed to U.S. energy security” and is proving “a significant source of new jobs and economic activity at a time when the economy is the top priority.”

The report’s findings include:

John Larson, IHS Vice president for public sector consulting, further observes that the collusion between unconventional oil and gas production and the high capital-intensive supply chain will make the US a “world leader” with “most of the dollars spent here and supporting American jobs.”

All of which bears out what former oil executive and research fellow at The Belfer Center, Leonardo Maugeri was predicting in August. After a field-by-field analysis of the bulk of the world’s major oil exploration and development projects, Maugeri’s report(PDF) concluded that, “by 2020, the world’s oil production capacity could be more than 110 million barrels per day (bpd), an increase of 20 percent.” And Maugeri predicts that the four leading producers will be Iraq, the United States, Canada and Brazil. Neither is it hard to see where it will come from as new technologies have made formerly difficult to extract deposits more commercially viable. Maugeri even predicts a global “glut of oil” after 2015 that could lead to a collapse in prices. He also foresees that the coming oil boom will become a fault-line environmentalists and the oil industry.

Such are the opportunities elsewhere that even the lure of vast oil and gas resources in the Arctic may be on hold – though the US Interior Department is selling 4.5 million acres of Arctic land leases for exploration in November.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the US Energy Administration (EIA) between 89 and 90 million bpd will be consumed in 2013. Global oil production has never exceeded 74 million bpd. In recent years, natural gas liquids and other liquids have made up the difference and will, together with already stored oil and innovations like natural gas to drive trucks and buses, continue to do so in the short term. However, the contribution from Canada’s oil sands, US shale oil, Brazil’s presalt oil among other resources is set to have an increasingly dramatic impact ushering in a new age of plentiful oil.

As one commentator on the coming oil boom put it, “It’s yet another reminder that what the expert consensus assure us to be true very often isn’t” adding “It was equally apparent we were running out of oil – until we weren’t.”

Equally, aiding the discovery of an abundance of relatively cheap hydrocarbons is something President Obama could claim as a vote-winning personal achievement – except it isn’t.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2012 9:08:13 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I bet its Kills Obama


2 posted on 11/17/2012 9:09:55 PM PST by scooby321 (AMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

I bet its Kills Obama


I bet Obama tries to kill it.


3 posted on 11/17/2012 9:22:07 PM PST by volunbeer (We must embrace austerity or austerity will embrace us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scooby321; All

Well, at least Interior is selling 4.5 million acres of oil land leases in Alaska. That sounds like a fairly large area. I have heard that one of the issues on public lands has been that companies were just sitting on leases and not doing anything with them so a bunch were canceled to be reactivated, or something like that. Hopefully someone here is more knowledgeable and can clarify this issue.


4 posted on 11/17/2012 9:22:11 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You have a regime which by design was driving up the costs and uses of energy the most a basic resource because it suits its socialist matrix. What’s even worse is the massive corrpution resulting from that regime doling out tons of funds towards its campaign donners for so called alternate forms which don’t work or are laughingly inefficient . That’ got a pass by the Romney campaign and a huge mistake because this policy affected everyone. It was a bread a butter issue affecting all Americans.


5 posted on 11/17/2012 9:23:26 PM PST by mosesdapoet ("A voice crying in the wilderness make streight for the way of the Lord")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thank God for Big Oil and the coming American oil boom. It’s one of the few reasons for optimism these days.


6 posted on 11/17/2012 9:30:11 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The one piece of bad news:

"Unconventional oil and gas activity will generate over $61 billion in federal and state tax revenues in 2012, rising to $91 billion annually in 2015 and $111 billion by 2020."

We need to starve the beast, not feed it. Cut the size and scope of government, not increase funding.
7 posted on 11/17/2012 9:32:26 PM PST by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If the government and environmentalists don’t stop them we desperatly need refineries.

For starters, start up the refinery on the California coast that they have stopped from using for over 40 years.

8 posted on 11/17/2012 9:34:45 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

is there some reason that shale oil
only exists in North America?

is shale oil existed worldwide,
the Arab hegemony would be broken


9 posted on 11/17/2012 9:40:08 PM PST by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTx

Oil shale is not exclusive to the U.S.A.

I believe it requires specialized equipment to find it, however.


10 posted on 11/17/2012 10:06:38 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
Around 12 years ago it was selling for $ 10 barrel. Today it seems impossible, but who knows.
11 posted on 11/17/2012 10:51:26 PM PST by Orange1998 (Please DO NOT PRESS CTRL W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet
One can take a good guess that those who are in the northeast after hurricane Sandy who were effected and are still left in the dark, without fuel will take a good long hard new look of hydrocarbon fuels.
Yes, those " GREEN " energy technologies are laughable and probability won't mature for a long time.
If the " GREENIES " want to help mature those " GREEN " energy technologies they can use the current technologies, the current use of hydrocarbon fuels to help fund and pay for the research by relaxing some of the regulations, taxes and let the economy and the new OIL BOOM flourish.
12 posted on 11/17/2012 11:15:46 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
Start building smaller scale refineries at a cheaper cost but more of them all over the place.
Same thing with building smaller pebble bottom safer nuclear power plants all over the place.
One reason that drives up the cost for most of these things is that they are centralized.
The same thing with government... when it's centralized it's less efficient.
Build more and more smaller scale refineries that could possibly made mobile ? modular ? that can be taken down and set back up in another area as needed.
Make more use of modular designs.
Have them put more funds into research and development into more smaller refineries, make them more modular, more efficient.
With a oil refinery that is not centralized it becomes less prone to risk of terrorism or some other accident.
13 posted on 11/17/2012 11:25:24 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Perhaps the reason Oil Shale is big in the USA is because the USA has more of it than the rest of the world ?
Maybe other countries do have it but there is so little of it that it's not worth the capital cost to go after it.
14 posted on 11/17/2012 11:27:56 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
The USA now enjoys perhaps the cheapest cost and source of natural gas than other counties.
We even have out paced Russia in natural gas development.
15 posted on 11/17/2012 11:29:58 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

I wonder whether these particular leases are the best leases?


16 posted on 11/18/2012 4:41:45 AM PST by gotribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
I bet its Kills Obama

I hope it kills Biden too!

17 posted on 11/18/2012 4:44:19 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

You are correct. China has the largest holdings in the world. The U.S. has the lead in exploration technology and knowledge - after all we started the oil industry, from exploration and production to refining. That leadership is something most politicians don’t ever appreciate. It’s a leadership lead as wide as our IT technology lead. So you can bet that as China and others seek to use their new-found reserves, they will turn to U.S. companies for help.


18 posted on 11/18/2012 4:45:13 AM PST by gotribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
Well, at least Interior is selling 4.5 million acres of oil land leases in Alaska.

Don' let em bamboozle ya kid!

What good is a lease if they won't let you have a drilling permit, won't approve the site construction, the well plan, etc.?

If you find oil, you still have to get it to market, no road, no pipeline permit, no EIS approval for the righto-of-way, you aren't going to make a dime, but the costs can run into the billions (right, with a 'b'). Oil companies are visionary in that they are always looking for 'the next big thing', but even so, dumping a lot of money into Exploration with little chance for payout is a great way to crash your company.

For now, the easier pickings are in the lower 48, on private leases, especially with the administration making noises about ending "subsidies" (which are the ordinary business expenses other industries deduct, not a payment by the government to the oil industry).

In reality, most oil companies pay three times as much in taxes as they make in profit.

19 posted on 11/18/2012 4:54:41 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
Start building smaller scale refineries at a cheaper cost but more of them all over the place.

So you want lower inefficiencies combined with more infrastructure being built, to duplicate existing capacity.

And you think that lowers cost?

20 posted on 11/18/2012 5:17:26 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson