If you go back to the first posting, I said it is my suspicion that Palin’s own polls showed her . . .” Now, answer MY question. (BTW, if you think Palin didn’t poll, then she is a stupid candidate. And if you think her polls showed she’d clean up, and she STILL didn’t run, then she would be stupider still. So that leads only one conclusion: that her polls showed she wasn’t doing well).
Listen, Mr. Slippery, you made an assertion that you have failed to back up with actual proof. This is what you said downthread from your earlier allegation about Palin's supposed polls:
Funny how those polls never seem to be valid when it comes to actual votes. Funny how Palin's OWN polls told her something different.
Now, in this conversation, I'm the only one who's offered any kind of stats to back up my argument. You're supposed to be the all-seeing, all-knowing swami of polling analysis around here. Why haven't you offered a single poll to prove your point?
It's because you can't find a single bit of documentary evidence to support your threadbare, shopworn argument.
Just admit that you're an establishment Republican and be done with it. You don't like Sarah Palin because....well...you just don't. I've been hearing the same empty-headed arguments about her for four years now.
Finis.