Posted on 11/16/2012 1:14:40 PM PST by JerseyanExile
Wait a sec, you say. Didn’t Gallup find just six months ago that the number who describe themselves as “pro-choice” was at a record low? Indeed they did.
But as the saying goes, my friends: Elections have consequences.
More voters than ever now identify themselves as pro-choice when it comes to abortion, and most rate the issue as important to how they vote.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely U.S. Voters shows that 54% describe themselves as pro-choice on the issue of abortion, while 38% say they are pro-life.
Let’s look at trends on abortion in a few recent polls. This one, from a WSJ poll in mid-October, isn’t too helpful because the only point of reference is data from March 2005. Even so, there’s a shift:
This, from a CNN poll taken in late August, is much more revealing:
Nice and steady there in the mid-20s for “legal under any circumstances” over the past five years — until suddenly, in August of this year, the number jumps. Why? Well, what else happened in August this year? Right: Todd Akin opened his yapper about “legitimate rape” and women’s supposed biological defense mechanisms against it and that was the beginning of the end for Republican chances to take back the Senate. How big a deal was it? Weeks later, the NYT poll was seeing more support for the idea that abortion should be “generally available” than it had in over 15 years:
The first column shows those who want abortion generally available, the second column shows those who think it should be available with stricter limits. Follow the last link and check the data and you’ll find that the last time “generally available” hit 42% was February 1995. Some of the movement may be due to Democrats’ relentless “war on women” messaging independent of Akin, but Akin was the rocket fuel they needed for it, I think. Nothing strange about that, really: Sentiments about abortion can shift quite sharply based on recent political circumstances. Remember what happened in Gallup’s polling on this subject shortly after O was inaugurated in 2009? Right — there was a sudden leap in the number who describe themselves as “pro-life,” to the point where it overtook “pro-choice” for the first time ever. That was mainly a reaction, I think, from abortion fencesitters who suddenly worried that O and his Democratic Congress might try to expand abortion rights too far. You’re seeing the opposite play out now with Akin, I suspect. Between him and Mourdock, fencesitters are alarmed at what they’re hearing about rape and are identifying as pro-choice to signal their opposition. That’ll level off in time, but it’s proof positive that Republicans lost more than just Senate seats when they said what they said. People who claimed that two inadvertently did damage to their own socially conservative cause weren’t kidding.
This show we need to get much better at fighting the fear porn that comes from the left, especially the media.
Cowardly RINO surrender monkeys caving in?
Abortion is infanticide!! Mass murder!! The American Holocaust!!
Never surrender to godless socialist butchers!!
BS
How did Rasmussen do on November 6?
Conservatives need to find a way to battle the MSM, that is what this shows. Somehow,someway we need to neutralize the state run media.
The only thing that will work is for more young people to see graphic pictures of aborted fetuses.
A country that does not value new life above the petty laziness of its existing leeches does not deserve to continue.
I don’t buy it. What do they mean by “Pro-Choice”? The poll is only as good as its definitions for the terms.
Many people are “Pro-Life”, but if pressed by strangers saying “Does that mean you want raped women and victims of incest to suffer?”, then they get skittish and back off.
Most Americans think abortions should be regulated and controlled, anything that says otherwise is a push poll.
We will not cave, we will not surrender and we will not negotiate the terms of our enslavement.
How any person could support, fanatically, the right to slaughter babies is simply beyond comprehension. The hand of the devil sits heavily on America.
The “Sandra Fluke” effect? ping.
It does appear to have sunk Akin, though, which is too bad for us.
I agree. Our biggest problem is long term indoctrination by schools and the MSM. We have to find alternate ways of at least getting these brainwashed people to question what they have been taught. We need to make it cool to rebel against the establishment and vote republican.
Rasmussen polled a Romney win. Can’t trust Rasmussen.
“How any person could support, fanatically, the right to slaughter babies is simply beyond comprehension.”
Oftentimes these same people will squawk fanatically and loudly for the protection of animals, especially wildlife.
I care for animals, but they are not and never will be above humans.
Babies, born and unborn, are to be protected above all.
The Republican Party running a famously, pro-abortion candidate,
who rejected the party’s pro-life platform on national TV on August 27, 2012,
hurt the pro-life movement.
How did Rasmussen do on November 6?
Good point. He lost a lot of credibility with his state calls
We’re all baby killers now. Me! Me! Me!
Ras is trying to drum up business with Satanists and baby killers. I guess $23 million in his Nazi bank account isn’t enough. (I made that number up. It could be lower or higher. It’s my estimate.)
The polls that tell us America is more conservative than liberal keep rolling on.
The polls that tell us Americans oppose most abortions keep rolling on.
The polls that tell us Americans are more pro-life than pro-choice keep rolling on.
But when Americans voted on Noveember 2 they voted the opposite way - again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.