Where to Adjust, Where to Stand Firm

The proper path for the Republican party lies somewhere between changing our entire agenda and standing steadfastly on everything. Opinions will differ on the best way forward, as we have seen in the week and a half since the sucker punch of Election Day.

Most conservatives seem to be coping well. We spent a lot of time during the campaign wondering if America as we recognize it would survive a second Obama term. Ever the pragmatists, we now seem committed to doing our part to minimize the damage.

But as we seek to mitigate the harmful effects of Obama 2.0 on our nation, we simultaneously look inward, for answers on how to win back the White House on Election Day 2016 (which is November 8, but who’s counting?)

Does that involve moderating our positions? Surrendering our core values? Or simply repackaging the positions we have always taken?

Let’s begin with the complete folly of cashing in the chips of conservatism. There are plenty of moderates in the party who would love nothing more than to see the whole Republican structure move toward them, zipping its lips on social issues, tossing the belief that America can be a force for good around the world and softening that harsh notion that spending and taxes are abhorrently high.

I believe parties should stand for something. I don’t see Democrats wringing their hands in extended introspections about moving toward the middle. Especially in this era, the left doubles down on its ideology and dares opponents to prove them wrong at the ballot box.

I confess a grudging respect for this-- not ideologically, but strategically. Centrist Democrats have a choice: find a way to back a party that recognizes its job is the purveyance of liberalism, or go be Republicans.

I would make the same offer to any Republican bellyaching about how far right the party has tacked. Are they kidding? After FDR and LBJ twisted the national rudder toward the expansionism that still poisons us, it will take three Reagans to turn it back around.

The ascendancy of the tea party-- or, as it should now be known, consistent conservatism-- is just the beginning of what will be necessary fort generations if we are to ever return to the size and scope of government the founders would smile on.

The only way to walk that path, of course, is to actually win elections. This is achieved by crafting an agenda that is attractive to a majority of voters, and hitching that agenda to candidates who give it a voice that attracts new adherents while repelling as few as possible.

The cruel reality of the election of 2012 is the millions of voters who agree with many Republican ideas but voted for Obama anyway, or did not vote at all. Success is found in compelling these people to vote for us.

Many are already socially conservative, especially in minority communities. The message of protecting the unborn and standing up for heterosexual marriage is a winner, not only in conservative America, but in middle America.

It is crazy that we actually have to teach Civics 101 to millions of people, but if we do, we do. So get ready to spend four years telling people that while our candidates are going to be socially conservative, abortion and gay marriage are properly settled in the states, not the Oval Office, and from abortions to contraception, their availability is not a White House issue, but who pays for it is. Then we pivot to things that are a President’s daily concern.

National security and the economy are at the top of that list. It is impossible to know how war-weary America will be in 2016, but we can never mitigate our high ground as the party that seeks to speak truth to evil around the world. I pray it will not take an Iranian nuclear strike on Israel or another 9/11 to open our eyes to the dangers of losing our focus in this regard.

There can always be thoughtful debate over where to mobilize American troops and how to maximize the deterrent effect of our defense spending. But there should be no doubt that our party, and our 2016 nominee, will have no more of “leading from behind” or further mortgaging the American leadership role which has made the world safer for well over a century.

While that is a message seasoned over the passage of years, we face a fast-approaching economic turnstile which could define the party for most of the days until the off-year vote of 2014, if not the entire remaining Obama presidency.

Amid all the shrill talk of fiscal “cliffs,” clarity is vital: Republicans either are, or are not, willing to cave in to people who say some of us are not taxed enough and we do not spend enough.

We must say no to such obscenity. We can talk all day, or all year, about how to package this so that women or voters of color or the youngsters will grasp why we do this, but along the way we simply cannot compromise on this. Pollster and word maven Frank Luntz will tell you that “wasteful Washington spending” is a term that will get three-quarters of America to nod in approval. It is about time we find a way to skillfully connect with those people.

So is there no issue that is ripe for reconsideration? Is our entire mission to stay the course ideologically, but repackage?

There is a growing choir in American conservatism that is changing a few pages in the hymnal. We are realizing that on the issue of immigration, the familiar strains of mass deportation are getting us clobbered.

Much of the criticism is grossly dishonest. From strong borders to deporting lawbreakers to refusing to invite further illegals with the DREAM Act or guest worker programs, there is not one shred of hostility toward Hispanics or immigrants in general.

Conservative opposition has been based on the rule of law. We have turned our heads as millions have streamed illegally into a country that cannot afford to absorb them. Forgiving and forgetting are hard under such circumstances.

But that is apparently what large majorities want to do, and they are not all liberal. From a business community that values the labor force, to a broad slice of the public that cannot stomach banishing those who have come here for a better life, America clearly wants to find a way to allow illegals to work and raise families along a path to citizenship.

So we have a choice. If we stick with the idea of rounding up every illegal alien and shipping them back to their mother countries, complete with their America-loving teenagers with 4.0 grade-point averages, we will commit electoral suicide.

But this is not like the morally-based social issues, where laxitude is out of the question, or economic issues, where to compromise is to slit the nation’s fiscal throat.

As a nation, we can have whatever immigration laws we like. I have spent years backing serious consequences for violating America’s borders, and I do not easily give ground on that view.

My opposition to guest worker programs and the DREAM Act and various other gifts to illegals has been the certain magnet they will create for future millions who will follow in their footsteps.

Only one thing will stop that. Only one thing can allow principled conservatives to seek common ground on a path to accommodate illegals who are already here.

This is a tall order. It may require vast increases in border patrol, or long miles of walls, real or virtual. We can start talking about that right now.

But if the talk is serious, and unencumbered by the nonsense that even strong borders are somehow anti-Hispanic or anti-immigrant, maybe we can find consensus on what to do with the illegals who are here already.

For too long, we have ignored our immigration laws to curry favor with Latinos and liberals of every other race. If we want to change those laws so that they can be respected again, let the process begin with a border that does what borders are supposed to do.

Once we achieve this, we may well want to make it easier to immigrate legally. If we are actually beginning to stem the tide of new illegals, that is well worth considering, as long as we are making clear that the path to citizenship for past illegals will involve some consequences, some taxes or penalties and an obligation to assimilate through English proficiency.

This complete package creates a landscape of laws that can be widely respected and actually enforced. And it could be part of a message that will open the door for millions of voters of every race and age and sex, to consider Republicans they would otherwise reject.

Adjust, HELL! Rush is right: liberals have not made the political gains they have made by “adjusting”, they’ve stuck to their guns and worn down the weak-kneed Republican establishment. If the Republican leadership keeps doing what it’s doing (giving in), it will keep getting what it’s getting!

——the left doubles down on its ideology and dares opponents to prove them wrong at the ballot box.-——

They were proved wrong at the ballot box.

The Republicans have a commanding mandate in the House of Representatives. The people spoke....... take control of taxes and spending.

The Senate and the President must now accept or reject the will of the people expressed by the House.

Conservatives did not lose. There are many, enough , in the House to strongly effect policy. The unelected vice president candidate has a big seat in the House of Representatives.

social conservatives, fiscal conservatives, libertarians all need to adjust...

we all need to accept the fact that each of our issues are not deal killers..

some are non negotiable, but there are different solutions to the problems other than the ones embedded in each of our heads..

in other words, start to respect the others positions, listen a little more and talk a little less...

stop openly attacking those that are actually your allies, and listen..

when I was a shop foreman, I learned that you can learn from the old guy with many years of experience, but the new guy, looking at it from a different perspective can teach you something too....

the adjustment that needs to be made is to stop bickering and start debating (just like this forum used to be)..

oh, and stop being a republican and start being a conservative..

Dear Sir we did not lose a fair election, we were robbed. Our message is good and sound. Yes we have divides, but it shows our flexibility to handle situations in a meaningful and long lasting way.
It is not time to change our message but its time to level the playing field. Things such as Ohio, PA and FL voting problems should be of major concern for everyone. Where are our elected leaders and judges on this. Doing half measures will not fix it. Total recounts by hand if need be. If our elected officials or protectors of the law cannot do it it's time to change the law or make sure it is forced. I am tried of being beaten by a system that says one thing and changes because someone sues. To hell with it it's time to stand up and make people obey the law and the intent of the law.

The election was stolen by enemies both foreign and domestic.
Since that is the point against what to stand for then we should not be part of the Republic.

Secession actions have indeed stirred up the hornets nest, without the full country under their control they will face a collapse in short order, anyone remember The Berlin Wall?

Strong majorities oppose amnesty. If we’re going to start backpedaling better to do it on issues that won’t give us 15 million more Democrat voters. Maybe we need to think about the least popular issue embraced by the right, so-called free trade, which wrecked the rust belt, the very place where Romney was crushed. Reagan protected the auto industry with quotas and it didn’t hurt him in 1984.

Then there are the issues that contradict each other. Do we want a robust war on terror and the capability to fight and occupy in three theatres at once or do we want fiscal restraint?

If House Republicans agreed to a deficit reduction deal where they allowed more defense cuts it wouldn’t cost them much politically. But that would require coming to terms with the fact that we’re flat out broke, something neither side wants to acknowledge.

When Fred Barnes was promoting big government “conservatism” to enable massive overseas nation building projects he neglected the problem of paying for it all if domestic spending not only continued unabated, but grew even faster as Bush doubled down with more Medicare goodies.

Now we reap the harvest, politically as a party and fiscally as a nation.

You cannot beat systemic cheating by the Liberals.

Conservatives must clean up the voter rolls & change the multiple ways that voter fraud stole the election.

Telling yourself that it didn’t happen is the worst kind of ‘head in the sand’ behavior.

Well, republicans lost, what, 10 seats in the house? That is not a mandate. If you think so, then the same electorate gave a mandate to Obama to be the Chief Executive in running the country.

really? The message is to do the people’s, and not the party’s business.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.