Yeah, read the whole article. it is all pretty weaslely. Nothing is clear. It says Petraeus knew almost immediately, but the numerous differing reports clouded the picture and the White House “fog of war” explanation began to break down pretty quickly. yada, yada, yada.
But only Petreaus would know when Obama gave the "STAND DOWN" order. That's what we want to know.
lol, Eva, I swear only you and I read the whole article. It IS pretty weasley. Petraeus supposedly “knew” it was terrorism, but there were 20 reports claiming it happened because of the video, so it took some time for it to be proven that it WASN’T the video.
How is this different than what we heard leaked from his Sept 14 testimony? He’s just trying to say that he knew these 20 reports would be disproved. He’s an idiot.
The only interesting piece of information is that he claims Rice’s CIA talking points came from the administration, not the CIA. Ummmmmmmm, what about the 20 intelligence reports that indicated the video instigated the attack? Again, I say, he’s an idiot.