[Wyrd bið ful aræd]

Why the continued character assassination attempts? It does nobody any good, and the campaign is ended.

I don't understand why a certain group of people here feel the need to keep slinging mud at the guy -- it is totally unbecoming.

Certainly he wasn't as far to the right as I would have liked, and I supported Perry, then Santorum in the primary. But Mitt ran a good campaign and more to the point, I became convinced that he is really a decent, well-meaning guy. I regret he couldn't have been our president.

And now that he is down, gone, and out, why do you want to keep bringing him up and trashing him?

[svcw]

How is exposing mormonISM caricature assassination?
Truth is never wrong.

[Colofornian]

And now that he is down, gone, and out, why do you want to keep bringing him up and trashing him?

(We assume you'll be texting or e-mailing McKay Coppins himself, author of this article, asking a similar question: "Now that Mitt is down, gone, and out, why do you, McKay, want to keep bringing him up??"

Seems to me that McKay's article on Mitt is going to garner a LOT more readership that one re-copy of that article on a web site that a lot of people still don't know about.

I frankly don't expect you to do that...which will simply show How inconsistent you are...more concerned about the x-generation down "courier" of the content than the author who generated the content itself! (And content that you'd rather the author "knew" is supposedly "down, gone, and out.")

[Elsie]

I don't understand why a certain group of people here feel the need to keep slinging mud at the guy -- it is totally unbecoming.

52,000 + bullcrap slingers traipsing around, pounding on doors, and you have the gall to whine about a few of US??

[greyfoxx39]

And now that he is down, gone, and out, why do you want to keep bringing him up and trashing him?

Don't give up hope...he WILL be back in 2016!