Posted on 11/13/2012 6:42:05 AM PST by SeekAndFind
As the 2012 election approached, conservative enthusiasm grew. Mitt Romney was drawing huge crowds while Barack Obama spoke in half-filled stadiums. All the passion lay on the right while the left was discouraged with a promised messiah who proved merely a politician. And the prediction was that, in contrast to 2008, Republican turnout would dwarf the tuned-out and carry the day.
Hence the shock November 6 eve. How could Romney lose, especially by such a wide electoral margin? Maybe he didn't. At least not legitimately.
When I predicted Obama's re-election, I stated that, despite our country's inexorable leftist slide, Romney would still win on Election Day were it not for vote fraud. I explained that the Democrats could steal more than enough votes in crucial swing states to turn the election. And I still believe what I did then: electoral criminality put Obama over the top.
At the time, we heard stories about electronic-machine "glitches" switching Romney votes to Obama ones. And Patrick Moran, son of Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA), was caught on tape facilitating vote fraud while Bridgeport, CT mayor Bill Finch essentially promised to commit same for a political partner in crime.
Since then, the indications of electoral criminality have been overwhelming. First there are the anecdotes, such as the court-appointed Republican poll watchers illegally expelled from 13 Philadelphia polling places in wards that, in most cases, went 99 percent for Obama; the poll observers who noted what they considered vote fraud but were powerless to stop; and the Democrats who actually bragged about voting more than once.
Then there are the statistics, such as this staggering fact: in 59 Philadelphia districts, Romney failed to get even one vote. Final Obama-Romney tally: 19,605 to 0. Huh? Not even one person voted GOP accidentally?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The problem with what you said, is that it is probably true. Entropy is an agonizingly inevitable concept....
“If people want to fight election fraud, then now is the time, St. Lucie is the place and Colonel West is the man!”
The GOP isn’t helping us so it falls on ‘We the People’. This will take $$$ for court actions and a recount. Stand with Colonel West with your support and contributions.
http://www.allenwestforcongress.com/
If it gets to that point, I’ll be around... I just won’t be home.
FReegards.
I believe we have stopped or inhibited double voting within state borders here in Mo by registering the voters on a statewide database. That doesn’t keep the border-dwellers from crossing state lines to cast another vote in another state, but put your AG’s feet to the fire! You know the excuses are just that.
If we can’t use the system to reform the system then all is lost.
I’m suspicious of the entire process. Not as it was meant to work but as it is being abused.
The media suggests up and down that nothing was misappropriated (no, never!) but that’s nothing more than an abuse of the power of suggestion!
Overall, “they” are scrutinizing all of the wrong people. The more they scrutinize you and me the more they appear to be clean. Who or what is the central scrutinizer? It’s a network of organizations public and private, foreign and domestic whose policies effectively discriminate against those deemed to be part of an unprotectable class of US citizen while at the same time, empower themselves, their partners in crime and their collective and specific agendas.
Anyway, that’s what I see as being the problem for us to solve and the solution was overdue as of 11/6/2012.
Maybe that’s what BO meant when he told Putin he would have more flexibility after the election - he knew he would win. No question.
Now, now... you know Romney is just too gol’ darned NICE to ever contest what may be blatant vote stealing. He’s so gosh darn NICE that that may explain why 3M people who voted for McCain in 2008 just stayed home this year. I mean, when such a NICE guy runs for office, isn’t it just a little, you know, MEAN, to vote for him when that would upset his opponent?
What did you expect from an illegal POTUS, free and fair elections?
I have fish and wood. Who has the bullets?
And the outcome is not at all out of step with recent history
— Yeah, they pull this stuff every election, doesn’t make it right. Many of these precincts also show 100% turnout, most over 90%. Do you really believe that ? A precinct made up almost entirely of people that have done nothing to help themselves their entire lives other than cashing govt. checks, but they are motivated enough to turnout 100% on the same day ? Impossible.
I think the Dems have gotten better at targeting areas where we’re not expecting them too. In the recall race it seemed like they swarmed Racine even more than Milwaukee. The biggest turnout in FL was actually in the Tampa/St Pete area where there was likely less scrutiny but still some major inner city areas. There have been reports of Sheboygan, WI being swamped with busloads of voters many voting Obama and the Republican line to bring less scrutiny.
All of this is expected but it’s the reports of R vote destruction that really seem to have increased this year, not just manufacturing D votes.
Everyone wants absolute proof, not just statistics and ,but how can we put together the resources to prove any of this unless we pay attention to the indicators 1st ? Proof only comes from investigation but no one wants to investigate unless there’s proof.
I have very little, if any doubt, about that. And the Russian knew exactly what Obama was alluding to.
I’m not so sure about that, wolfpat. I’m one of those real conservatives who initially didn’t plan to vote for Mittens..and i caved.
I know others who did same. Maybe a small percentage stayed home but I think most of us came to realize that a vote for Rom was a vote against Bam and that made it easier.
-— Exactly, I’ve read hundreds of posts that stated just that. However, only one person has reported they voted for McCain but not Romney. That is what they want us to believe though. There were throngs of people that voted for McCain but thought less of Romney. I believe a lot of people stayed home but I don’t believe enough stayed home that turned out for McCain to lose OH. Especially since only OH and PA showed lower turnout for Romney amongst the comparable states in the area and the other battlegrounds. Something happened to those votes.
Yea, and the elections in 2000 and 2004 were stolen but mostly in 2000...
It has happened before... in the Thirties, the 24th Ward in Chicago (then heavily Jewish, now African American) delivered 110% of the vote for Roosevelt. No questions were asked because Langdon was thoroughly whipped and carried only two or three states nationally.
Even if it does not result in changing the outcome of an election, vote fraud and illegal electioneering in all of its forms has to be prosecuted as often as possible wherever and whenever it occurs.
There will be future elections and the integrity of the ballot needs to be maintained. This was the last election in Pennsylvania without voter identification being required (a liberal judge suspended the law for 2012 to benefit the Democrats, but the law is now in effect).
Thank you! I’m somewhat of a flag buff, but I’d never seen this one!
Florida vote tally for congressional seats by party
(there were 2 uncontested districts, these vote totals will be added to the final tally)
republican 3,805,855
democrat 3,494,131
Florida votes for president in the same districts
Romney 3,502,413
Obama 3,532,998
Are we supposed to believe that 303,442 people voted for
republican congressmen and not Mitt Romney?
so lets say that these people did vote for Romney
(which i find very likely),the final tally is as follows
Romney 4,465,616
Obama 4,236,032
` ROMNEY WINS !!!!!!
This is more proof ...stolen election
I used the vote Tally Data from Politico.com
on November 11, 2012
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.