Posted on 11/11/2012 6:57:06 PM PST by mgist
Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud Rachel Alexander
Nov 11, 2012 Click if you like this column!
Sign-Up
There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep on giving, despite the long-term unsustainability.
In spite of those odds, polls indicated that Romney was going to win the election. The economy is close to Great Depression era conditions, and unemployment is almost as high as when Obama entered office. Economic conditions became so dire after Obama took office it prompted the rise of an entire new movement, the Tea Party. Presidents rarely win reelection when the economy is in the tank.
So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states. According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio's Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio's 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.
The inflated numbers can't just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by Videographer James O'Keefe, known for his undercover videos exposing left wing fraud, caught a Virginia Democratic Congressman's son on video in October explaining how to commit voter fraud. Patrick Moran, the son of Rep. Jim Moran, told O'Keefe's videographer that in order to make a vote for someone else, you'd need two pieces of identification, such as a utility bill, explaining, "they can fake a utility bill with ease, you know?" He went on to advise the videographer that he should also call the voter and pretend to be a polling company in order to make sure the voter isn't intending to vote. He said that Democrat attorneys would be located in the polling places to assist him if challenged casting one of these illegal votes.
In another video, O'Keefe's videographer tells a DNC staffer from Obama's Organizing for America that she intends to vote in both Texas and Florida. The staffer laughs and says, "It's cool." The staffer then prints out a voter registration form for the undercover videographer and advises her on what to do if she gets caught.
These are just the known instances of attempted voter fraud. How many instances occurred that were not discovered? Obama's Organizing for America looked up voters in swing states – many who would not have bothered voting otherwise – and got them to vote. How did they get them to vote? They may have given them rides to the polls, they may have offered to fill out and return their ballots for them, or they may have voted ballots for the ones who were not going to vote.
Many on the left believe there is nothing wrong with committing fraud in order to ensure Obama's reelection. It is a common tenet on the left that the ends justify the means. Saul Alinsky, the 1960's radical who inspired Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, taught community organizers like Obama that dishonesty is acceptable if it achieves your political goals. And when caught, Alinsky teaches radicals to deny the wrongdoing and change the topic to put their accusers on the defensive. One Obama supporter brazenly posted on Facebook that he was voting four times for Obama, asserting that the ends justify the means.
Aiding Obama's win was a devious suppression of the conservative vote. The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased drastically since 2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for overseas military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.
Voter fraud has been in the works for years. At least 52 employees of the left wing group ACORN have been convicted of voter registration fraud. ACORN itself was convicted of the crime of "compensation," paying its registration canvassers bonuses to exceed their quotas. In 2008, 36% of ACORN's voter registrations were invalidated. Left wing political pundit Chris Matthews admitted last year that pretending to call someone from a polling company, then voting their ballot for them, has been happening in big cities since the 1950's. He admitted he knows that kind of voter fraud takes place in Philadelphia.
Strong-arming people into voting who really have no desire to vote undermines our form of government. People do not choose to vote because they are uninformed about the issues and candidates, are lazy, cynical, or are content with the status quo. Voting someone else's ballot for them is cheating the system and essentially giving yourself two votes.
When people claim that Obama won because the economy was improving, or because Americans generally think he is doing a good job, it is not true. He won through dishonest methods and rhetoric. Many of the votes cast in the swing states were cajoled, some legally and perhaps even more illegally, into supporting him. If voter fraud becomes acceptable, then maybe Donald Trump is right: it's time for a revolution.
>> “But, the amount of fraud required to pull this off didn’t happen.” <<
.
Go back to sleep.
Of course it happened, and has happened to slightly lesser extents in recent previous elections. The fraud is chiefly in the coding of the instructions in the vote machine operating systems. The disenfranchisement of the military was also a part of it, but the above is the biggest element. You can bet that those instruction lines have been purged now, but they’ll be back if we ever have another election (doubtful).
The circumstances of this election were accurately predicted by Stansberry Associates, well before the election.
Michael Savage (the weiner) wouldn’t even be on the air, were it not for Broadcast Fraud (representing Savage as a patriotic, intelligent, articulate conservative).
He’s there to discredit conservative ideals. His presence on air accomplishes that goal effectively.
>> “Isn’t it amazing how much you can accomplish if you have the audacity to flagrantly ignore the rules?” <<
.
Rules are for the irrelevent (us, apparently).
>> “One out of five registered Ohio voters is bogus” <<
.
It could be far worse in the SF Bay Area.
I’ve lived in my neighborhood for 32 years, and know the names of the residents of every house, quite well, but when I’m signing in to vote I see whole pages with names that I don’t recognize.
It’s one of His inconceivable potencies. He gives us free will and lets us choose evil, but He is not responsible for the evil humans choose; but when they choose evil, they pay the price, under His supervision as always.
He never does evil. Regarding authorities appointed by God, I agree if you mean universal authorities who do His will; presidents? Ha, no way - just more free will in action. 0bastard wasn’t placed there personally by God. He merely allowed it all to happen due to the wrong desires of humans.
Of course, everything is also part of larger plans, only know to Him. And “everything the Lord does serves many purposes”.
Really, that's interesting. What about Daniel 4:17?
God’s will is always done, even if it is allowing sinful people to dominate or have their will be done. Like dogs on a short leash, they’re allowed to run for a bit, but after a while the choker collar kicks in.
Doesn’t necessarily mean that God wants evil to happen, at all - but He allows it, because of that free will He gives us.
A thread about fraud, there are many more. Don’t expect everyone else to do your research. A cursory reading of FR in the last few days should have informed you about massive voter fraud.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2957976/posts?page=80
Happy to see you’ve got Him all figured out. ;)
Just writing what I learned with study, I know nothing on my own.
Current link.
The GOP is in on it
They were also never going to challenge Obama for fear of being seen as racist.
Probably jfk..and Clinton,too
Probably most of California and NY.
Do you categorize God’s Wants with His Will?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.