Posted on 11/10/2012 4:05:42 PM PST by Kaslin
On Tuesday only one precinct had less than 113% turnout. “The Unofficial vote count is 175,554 registered voters 247,713 vote cards cast (141.10% ). The National SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter turn out, the highest in the county.”
The Supervisor of Elections, Gertrude Walker, had this to say concerning the 141% voter turnout: “They may have had something like that in Palm Beach County, but we’ve never seen that here.”
So maybe Allen West wasn’t crazy to ask for a lock-down on the ballot boxes and machines in this county. According to the report given the day after elections, Allen B. West garnered 52,625 votes in St.Lucie county and Patrick Murphy 65,896 votes.
This is a problem that must be addressed right away. There is no reason that there should ever be more than 100% turnout. This county alone could have cost Allen West his election. Voter fraud is real, and it is time that this be solved.
I probably gave too much all at once - something I do way too often. I can take it a piece at a time if that would help.
Obviously you don’t get it, they are all part of the same club. At least the establishment ruling class is, which is why you will not see any Leadership wonks do or say anything about voter fraud. They don’t like thos rascally tea party types either and would rather lose so as not to upset the apple cart so to speak.
I have just completed reading your information, and my response is a jaw-gaping, “WOW.”
Thank you for your research and writing efforts - commendable.
Is anybody listening and acting upon this?
I had thought after all the legal shenanigans in GA, SC, AL, and whatever other states, his BC was a moot point...
Actually hope the truth of the matter is the end of his “reign”.
If you’ve read what I gave you, you are the one to be commended. You have done more than I can even get my extended family to do.
Nobody will touch this. The rule of law be damned.
I had somebody submit a comment to my blog, admitting that they had committed the felony of helping create Obama’s forged BC. They said my resistance was futile because Obama is immune from prosecution and so are they. Said that the FBI knows they did this and will cover for them. Also said that *I* would end up in jail. Considering the NDAA allows the feds to detain indefinitely anybody who is a “belligerent” (which is undefined so it’s up to Obama to define it....), I don’t consider that a vain threat, if this poster was genuine.
So I tried to check into whether the poster was genuine. What I can tell you is that they used a gateway to hide who they really are and when a VERY talented hacker got close to finding out who they really are, he hit a tripwire that totally fried his computer.
The same people who publicly BOASTED that they created a forged Kenyan BC which they gave to Orly Taitz.... went to the trouble of using a gateway and setting up tripwires to destroy anybody who got close to finding out who they really are when they admitted to creating Obama’s forgery. Methinks they are not joking on this one.
Angered by something I had said, they admitted that I was totally right. But they said I should give up, because I will never find anybody who will take the rule of law seriously.
That’s where we’re at. I’ve said from the outset that this is an issue of the rule of law, and that America no longer has the rule of law. People need to realize that this is the confidence that the Obama regime has: nobody will ever hold them accountable to the law, on ANYTHING they ever do.
There is now nothing that is impossible to them.
People need to absorb what that means.
My husband and children have absorbed it. They know my days could well be numbered. Yet the government would claim I have no standing to challenge Obama in any way; I haven’t yet been hurt badly enough. When I’m dead it will be too late. When I’m in Gitmo there will be no way to challenge anything. That’s where we’re at.
I recall having read about the computer “trip wires” in some of your writings. Unbelievable...
My computer is pinging me as I type... No new messages on any of the sites I am logged onto... Curious. (Now I am sensing paranoia - LOL)
You hang in there and keep up the excellent research and writing. Something GOOD must happen from all of this!
They were not allowed to do so. I witnessed a fellow voter telling the worker that no vote was cast on page 2, response was that both ballots must be deposited.
Where was that at?
See, I would never even THINK of doing anything with the ballots except vote on them and then put them in the sleeve as instructed. That’s why it didn’t even occur to me that somebody would submit half a ballot. But unless that’s what happened 300+ times these numbers don’t add up.
Our ballots did not contain a straight party choice. Any know if that’s required? Thanx.
Sorry to be so late reading this and responding to it. By what theory (if you can imagine) is Obama “immune” from prosecution?
I just had a discussion a while back regarding whether a sitting POTUS can be charged with crimes without first being impeached. The view set forth was that while a POTUS is in office they are immune from prosecution except by Congress through impeachment. If Congress finds him guilty in the impeachment process then the law enforcement system also deals with him, but without impeachment criminal justice prosecution has to wait until after he leaves office. And of course, as long as he is in office he can pardon anybody he wants so his partners in crime are off the hook too.
I think that is a recipe for disaster, and I cannot believe that the Founding Fathers would have put that system in place. I haven’t researched it thoroughly but my gut-level reaction is that this so defies the rule of law and accountability that the Founders insisted upon, that this understanding has to be a misinterpretation of the Constitution. Maybe they never envisioned a Congress and system as corrupt as ours is now, but having just gotten free of King George III, I suspect they knew it could easily become like this, if politicians are exempt from obeying the laws because nobody can ever do anything about their crimes anyway.
Thanks for elaborating. I agree. It doesn’t sound correct. Certainly in Obama’s case, since he’s not eligible in the first place, the question of impeachment versus indictment is also out there. Somewhere else, you compared the US to Egypt and Obama to Morsi. Right on. The personalities, methods, behaviors, and even the WORDS they speak and the rationalizations they offer are the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.