Posted on 11/10/2012 3:14:18 PM PST by smoothsailing
It ain’t over. Not by a longshot.
grrrrr
141% voter turn out in St. Lucie county! (in West’s district)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2958094/posts
I am sure someone is busy right now in some secret room making sure that everything looks right. Names and signatures can still be added to the books and made to look like they put there on election day. Ballots can be re-created as need be. It can all be fixed.
You’re still correct.
Let’s see the books, you fraudsters, and we don’t mean the cooked books.
On election night I was monitoring Drudge, which had a running count of the Florida presidential vote. Romney was leading. All of sudden, following an update, about 35,000 votes were removed from the Romney total. Anybody else see this?
“Now there is no recourse.”
Yes there is. He can take it to the House of Representatives, which is the sole judge of its membership.
The House can (and has in the past) decide whom to admit when there were ballot issues.
Usually the party with the majority decides to admit their fellow party member; but the point is, the House can decide whom to admit.
I didn’t see that. Maybe it is related to the shenanigans in St. Lucie County somehow.
..................
Walker said the ballots in question were from a group of more than 37,000 early votes cast in the race. Most of the early ballots were counted shortly after 7 p.m. on Tuesday, Walker said. But she said some of the ballots were on memory cards that could not initially be uploaded onto tabulating machines. Those ballots were counted later in the evening, she said.
I dont have any problem recounting ballots, said Walker, but she said shell have to wait for a judges ruling. If it was my decision, Id say, Hey, when? because I have no problem. But we have to follow the law and the law does not give the (canvassing) board discretion to make a decision to recount.
......................
And now she’s decided that she will recount those ballots again tomorrow (see post #9) after claiming she has no such authority to do so without a court order. This is the SECOND time she will have recounted the early ballots. The first recount flipped the election by 4,000 votes and gave it to Murphy. Neither time has there been a court order.
Note that the both totals here are inaccurate, and that the %turnout should be higher.
Please go to this link for details about tomorrow.....
http://www.allenwestrepublic.com/2012/11/10/urgent-come-help-st-lucie-issues-decision-to-recount-votes-earlier-sunday-700am/
You can see the massive voter fraud in St Lucie County here......http://www.allenwestrepublic.com/2012/11/10/allen-west-for-congress-released-this-statement-regarding-the-state-of-the-race-in-floridas-18th-district/
We had them recount in Palm Beach County and Allen West is ahead!! Now we battle in St Lucie!!
~The Conservative Diva~
http://www.Theconservativediva.net
(561) 236-9061
~ AllenWest4Congress ~
http://www.allenwestforcongress.com/
I despise my fellow dummycrat voters.
I’m not sure I understand what you are saying? The amount of registered voters for that day was 175,554 and they supposedly had 247,713 votes cast which is 141% or over 100% of actual voters listed as registered.
What do you see incorrect?
No — that is incorrect.
If that was the issue don’t you think that Col West would say so in his just released statement.
Instead he is taking direct aim at the source of the fraud — the 4000 votes that were mysteriously discovered after the official count. Read his statement. It says nothing about 141% voter turnout.
Voter turnout in St Lucie was 71% not 141% as hundreds on this site have been misinformed and are misinforming others:
http://enight.dos.state.fl.us/CountyReportingStatus/
The numbers do not add up to the totals. I checked the one’s columns, since the total % seemed low, given the precinct %s.
I believe Congress could refuse to seat Murphy, but Boehner is a pussy and they wanted West out anyway...The stupid and spineless party strikes again...
Exactly how I see it.
The “picture” you posted is not evidence of vote fraud or over-voting. Look at it closely, the percentages are in reference to “cards cast” by registered voters. Each voter was given two cards, each card was for different items on the ballot (for example, card #1 had items 1-10, card #2 had items 11-20) They were not duplicate cards. You couldn’t vote for the same thing twice.
COME SEE THE HANGING CHAD on SUNDAY NOVEMBER 11, 2012 AT 7:00!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.