I contend that every one of those voters would have voted for Obama even if Hurricane Sandy made landfall a week after Election Day ... and they would have cited some other "most important issue" that motivated their vote.
If a Republican candidate who is facing a half-@ssed, mediocre incumbent in a presidential election ends up losing because of the votes cast by retarted voters who vote for a president based on the last four days of an election cycle, then he simply wasn't a very good candidate to begin with.
Two can play this game. Please provide for me the evidence that "the 15%" would all have voted for Obama and none of them would have voted for Romney if Sandy H. had never existed.
Kristie Creme and Sandy helped Obama which hurt Romney with these flaky voters, which appears to be the consensus opinion around here. And Kristie is acting like he wants to change his party. The Dems can have him.
The fact is that ABC, Gallup, and Rasmussen had Romney 5% to 6% over Obama with about a week to go, and on election day, these national polls were down to a 1% difference which is really too close to call for any candidate.