The right balance of freedom and ownership will allow 3D printing to flourish.
To: AD from SpringBay; al_c; AnalogReigns; archy; bmwcyle; Boogieman; bigbob; BuffaloJack; capt B; ...
2 posted on
10/31/2012 7:21:33 PM PDT by
null and void
(Day 1380 of the Obama Regime - Barack Hussein Obama an enemy BOTH foreign AND domestic)
To: null and void
So long as we control the data on our computers, no amount of DRM or inventive copyrights is going to deter, much less prevent people cracking the protections and printing out whatever they want. Thinking otherwise shows a fundamental lack of technical understanding that the author should’ve had before sitting down at the keyboard.
Sorry - it’s a pet peeve.
3 posted on
10/31/2012 7:29:43 PM PDT by
TheZMan
(Obama is without a doubt the worst President ever elected to these United States)
To: null and void
SFL...this topic fascinates me....
4 posted on
10/31/2012 7:32:10 PM PDT by
M1903A1
("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
To: null and void
The various schemes advanced by the traditional recording industry hardly enriched those who thought they'd be protected. Taylor Swift, following on the very profitable example of Prince, released an album through two department store chains and sold over 1 million records in a couple of weeks ~
Protecting your intellectual property rights by beating up on computer users is not as good as making lots of money.
7 posted on
10/31/2012 7:53:49 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: null and void
Yawn. Another nail in the coffin of the intellectual property mafia.
A real information age won’t happen until the idiocy of IP law is abandoned.
To: null and void
This is going to be a very interesting battle between patents and the ability to create items with 3D. This could be the battle of the century.
This 3D technology is an exceptional advancement and will test the previous standings in court. Gong to be fun watching though...
9 posted on
10/31/2012 8:00:06 PM PDT by
Deagle
(quo)
To: null and void
Gold bars made of Tungsten.
14 posted on
10/31/2012 8:14:29 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: null and void
It will be 15 seconds before a work around happens.
It is not enough to have the patent since it will not take much effort to simply scan and duplicate.
a 3d photocopier.
planned obsolencence is in danger since parts will no longer be subject to being retired.
30 posted on
10/31/2012 8:58:55 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: All
Oh this worked reaaaaaly well with region coding of DVDs......NOT
33 posted on
10/31/2012 9:04:32 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: null and void
Enter Nathan Myhrvold, former chief technology officer at Microsoft, and the head of Intellectual Ventures, a company promoting what it calls innovation marketplace services...
...but actually trying to make it's money by filing, camping on and suing over ridiculously broad patents it has no intention of ever putting to any practical use itself.
To: null and void
So, is the idea here to provide copy protection for 3D printing files? Or to control the use of a program through licensing and copyrights, like buying apps for a phone for example? From the way the article is written, it sounds like some one wants to put use controls on generic manufacturing processes (machining, rolling, stamping, welding, printing, etc.) verses just protecting IP content of a design.
57 posted on
10/31/2012 10:25:28 PM PDT by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
63 posted on
11/01/2012 5:37:04 AM PDT by
Jack of all Trades
(Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson