Posted on 10/26/2012 9:12:52 AM PDT by Nachum
Reuters has yet to explain a possibly false or misleading report quoting a purported protester by his first name who described a supposedly popular demonstration against an anti-Muhammad film outside the U.S. mission in Benghazi.
The widely circulated Reuters article is now apparently contradicted by the news agencys own new reporting. Two days ago, Reuters broke the story that White House and State Department officials were immediately informed by email that an Islamic terrorist group had claimed credit for the Benghazi attack.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
I don’t put all that much importance on the fact that a terrorist group took credit for the attack. They could have been bragging or just lying.
What is incontovertible is the fact that there was never a mob that was incensed about a video. No mob—no way that their protests could have escalated to a riot, and the subsequent murders!
It was always a terrorist attack, from the beginning. And Obama, Hillary, and all of their minions knew it.
Reuters dispensed with their credibility a long time ago. The new media is running circles around these old bastards when it comes to speed and accuracy of news reporting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.